Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 23

Thread: $84K question

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Holly Ridge, NC
    Posts
    621

    Default

    Because it says Orvis on it. Some clown with more $$$ than sense will buy it so he can brag about it.

    If i win that $249milion powerball today i still wouldnt buy it. Just dumb.

    It is a nice truck though.
    First but gone: 91 3 door Disco "White Rhino"
    77 Series III 88 ex MoD "Shongololo"
    Gone and I miss her: 97 D1 5 speed
    04 DII
    08 D3 (LR3)

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    N. York
    Posts
    1,635

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by msggunny View Post

    If i win that $249milion powerball today i still wouldnt buy it. Just dumb...

    I think I would, if only to drive everyone here bananas.
    1965 SIIa 88",1975 Ex-MOD 109/Ambulance, 1989 RRC, blah, blah, blah...

    Land Rover UK Forums

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Portland, OR
    Posts
    298

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lrdukdog View Post
    Yes, the check straps are wrong should be out board of the frame rails.
    Are you sure that wasn't a quirk of the NADA 109's? Mine was set up exactly the same - straps inboard, and I don't remember there being a bracket on the chassis to attach them outboard.
    '67 109 NADA #413 - rebuilding w/ TDI & galvy chassis.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    The Granite State (NH)
    Posts
    3,435

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by superstator View Post
    Are you sure that wasn't a quirk of the NADA 109's? Mine was set up exactly the same - straps inboard, and I don't remember there being a bracket on the chassis to attach them outboard.
    The check strap brackets are on both sides of the chassis rail (at least on my '73 109)--The bump stop mounts to the bottom of the check strap brackets on each side of the chassis rail.

    Quote Originally Posted by yorker View Post
    I think I would, if only to drive everyone here bananas.
    After buying it, you'd have to take it out on the narrowest, brush-lined muddy trail you could find at Guy Fawkes to REALLY drive everyone bananas (well, except me, that is).
    --Mark

    1973 SIII 109 RHD 2.5NA Diesel

    0-54mph in just under 11.5 minutes
    (9.7 minutes now that she's a 3-door).

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Jacksonville, FL and Maine
    Posts
    1,743

    Default

    Well I'd love to have $84K free to spend on all of my Rovers . . .

    I'd have the 65 109 for the wife, 109 P-up for me, 66' 88 for the woods and probably a nice little plow truck too. My shop would be a lot nicer in FL and there would be a decent barn in Maine too.
    1958 107 SW - Sold to a better home
    1965 109 SW - nearly running well
    1966 88 SW - running but needing attention
    1969 109 P-UP

    http://www.facebook.com/album.php?ai...2&l=64cfe23aa2

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    killingworth CT
    Posts
    836

    Default yikes!

    Seems like a lot of money. But then again someone out there would be willing to pay it. Someone naive.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Portsmouth, VA
    Posts
    321

    Default 109 SW

    Quote Originally Posted by cedryck View Post
    Seems like a lot of money. But then again someone out there would be willing to pay it. Someone naive.
    Probably one of the 1%ers would and think they got a good deal.
    Jim Wolf

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Auckland, NZ
    Posts
    451

    Default

    Did II-A's have a removable cross member? I thought that was a series III change?

    In the series III chassis the axel straps can go on either outside or inside the chassis rail. There are brackets for both options. I guess depending on whether it is a one ton and has the wider axel housing and deeper offset wheels, or if it is the standard 109 with cheese axels.

    See where I am going with this? If you look at the chassis in this image, I may be completely wrong and I am sure those who know will tell me, but that galvanised chassis looks like a series III not a II-A.



    So as others have said, would make a lovely daily driver. I would call it a rebuild, not a restoration. OME shocks? And that roof liner hasn't been fitted too well.

    In this part of the world, umm $6-8 grand. Maybe.
    Alan

    109 Stage 1 V8 ex-army FFR
    2005 Disco 2 HSE

    http://www.youtube.com/user/alalit

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    East Granby, CT
    Posts
    1,884

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by disco2hse View Post
    In this part of the world, umm $6-8 grand. Maybe.
    That's it. I'm moving to NZ. But first I'll sell my Lightweight and buy 4 or 5 beautiful Rovers when I get there.

  10. #20

    Default Cost

    You all like to poke fun, but what do you think it would cost to get a 109 into that condition? And done at professional hourly rates , not at home?
    1968 battlefield ambulance/camper
    1963 Unimog Radio box
    1995 LWB RR

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
About us
Unparalleled product knowledge. Our mission is to support all original Land Rover models no longer supported by your local Land Rover franchise. We offer the entire range of Land Rover Genuine Parts direct from Land Rover UK, as well as publish North America's largest Land Rover publication, Rovers Magazine.
Join us