Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: differential gear ratio opinions

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Southern California
    Posts
    86

    Default differential gear ratio opinions

    I'm contemplating changing the differential ratios on a '66 109, S2a from the standard 4.71 to either a 4.11 or a 4.43.

    The engine will be rebuilt so it will be strong, and I will have 235/85 tires (31.7") and an overdrive (Fairey; .78 ratio). This should take the RPMs (with o/d) at 70mph, for example, down from 3132 to 2946 (with the 4.43) or to 2733 (with the 4.11). I do commute in the truck so the highway RPMs matter to me; I also drive around town a lot. And, I don't want to lose the off-road performance; the low range 1st gear overall ratios would change from 40.81 (with the 4.71) to 38.38 (with the 4.43) or 35.61 (with the 4.11).

    At this point I'm seeking others' opinions, particularly if you have experience with a similar setup. I can imagine the modest but nice difference on the highway but I have little sense for whether the changes would matter that much off-road, or even around town.

    Thanks for any thoughts on this.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    North MS
    Posts
    977

    Default

    Ashcroft has a few more ratios to consider. I went with the 4.37's with limited slip. Unfortunately, it will be some time before I get to drive it to give a report. My experience is therefore limited to the Rover 4.7's and 3.54's. IMO, the 4.7 is too low (makes everything scream to highway speed), and the 3.54 is just a little too tall (my 110 struggles to pull them, even with the Turbo). But many people report that they are happy with the 3.54's in a Series rig with a strong motor. That said, I think you'd notice more a difference (in the positive) with the 4.11's.

    https://www.ashcroft-transmissions.c...ype-diffs.html
    61 II 109" Pickup (Restomod, 350 small block, TR4050)
    66 IIA 88" Station Wagon (sold)
    66 IIA 109" Pickup (Restomod, 5MGE, R380)
    67 IIA 109" NADA Wagon (sold)
    88, 2.5TD 110 RHD non-hicap pickup

    -I used to know everything there was to know about Land Rovers; then I joined the RN Bulletin Board.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Flagstaff, Arizona
    Posts
    1,087

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by andrew View Post
    I'm contemplating changing the differential ratios on a '66 109, S2a from the standard 4.71 to either a 4.11 or a 4.43.

    The engine will be rebuilt so it will be strong, and I will have 235/85 tires (31.7") and an overdrive (Fairey; .78 ratio). This should take the RPMs (with o/d) at 70mph, for example, down from 3132 to 2946 (with the 4.43) or to 2733 (with the 4.11). I do commute in the truck so the highway RPMs matter to me; I also drive around town a lot. And, I don't want to lose the off-road performance; the low range 1st gear overall ratios would change from 40.81 (with the 4.71) to 38.38 (with the 4.43) or 35.61 (with the 4.11).

    At this point I'm seeking others' opinions, particularly if you have experience with a similar setup. I can imagine the modest but nice difference on the highway but I have little sense for whether the changes would matter that much off-road, or even around town.

    Thanks for any thoughts on this.
    The sweet spot of a 2.25 petrol is in the 3000-3200 RPM range. Good power, reasonable torque & fuel efficiency. That engine is designed to happily run all day in that RPM range. Drop the RPM too much and your engine has to work harder to turn the tyres and your fuel mileage suffers. Get into the hills and you will really notice the difference as you gear down sooner. Personally I wouldn't touch it. You will be happier at 40:1 in low first than the taller ratios.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Southern California
    Posts
    86

    Default

    Thanks for the feedback, jp and Teriann, I appreciate it.

    Another perspective from a well-informed source was that the 4.11 is about 12% or so higher than a 4.7 -- whereas 12% at 65 mph is a lot, 12% at very slow speeds (e.g., when negotiating an obstacle in low range) is not much at all. So, their view was that the change would buy me more at high speeds than I would lose at low (off-road) speeds.

    I am really torn as to what to do (4.11 v. 4.7). I like the idea of an easier time on the highway and reduced RPMs, but I'm reluctant to diminish the off-road capabilities too much. Also, it's unclear just how much difference this would make in around-town driving, which I do a lot, but I think the 4.11 might actually make things a bit more civilized in that instance (smoother starts off the line in 1st gear, etc.). The problem is of course that I only know my own, current truck well and have had no chance for a direct comparison to really feel the difference.

    Once this is all settled out I'll report back on my driving experiences for others, but in the meantime I'd appreciate any additional info/opinions/thoughts that might help me make the right call...I need to decide now.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Flagstaff, Arizona
    Posts
    1,087

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by andrew View Post
    Thanks for the feedback, jp and Teriann, I appreciate it.

    I am really torn as to what to do (4.11 v. 4.7). I like the idea of an easier time on the highway and reduced RPMs
    The problem is that with the 4.11:1 is that your engine will be working harder to push your tyres. Unless you are going downhill the carb throttle will be open more to get to and maintain those speeds. Your acceleration will suffer, and you may find yourself in third over on slight inclines into a mild headwind. Its your money, & a pair of 4.11:1 R&P gears are not all that cheap, esp if you have someone set the diffs up for you. Personally, if I still had my 8:1 2.25L petrol engine I would not do it. Choice is yours but you will be cruising below optimum RPM for that engine.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
About us
Unparalleled product knowledge. Our mission is to support all original Land Rover models no longer supported by your local Land Rover franchise. We offer the entire range of Land Rover Genuine Parts direct from Land Rover UK, as well as publish North America's largest Land Rover publication, Rovers Magazine.
Join us