Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: parabolics

  1. #1

    Default parabolics

    Do they make any parabolics out there that dont raise your ride up?I need to replace just my rear springs but dont want the rover to looked "jacked up".I like my stock tires.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Bloomfield, CT
    Posts
    1,382

    Default

    I wouldn't think it's a good idea to mix and match parabolics with conventional multi-leaf springs, especially parabolics in the rear and conventional in the front. You could have some unusual handling characteristics in a hard turn manuver at speed.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    N. York
    Posts
    1,635

    Default

    it will looked jacked up regardless with new springs on the rear and old ones on the front.
    1965 SIIa 88",1975 Ex-MOD 109/Ambulance, 1989 RRC, blah, blah, blah...

    Land Rover UK Forums

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    375

    Default

    I just replaced the springs on my 1972 109 SW and I was concerned about the same thing but was pleasantly surprised that it really did not make a big difference. I did the two leaf front and the three leaf rear. I think it would make a big difference on a military chasis.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    New Mexico
    Posts
    364

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ctrover
    Do they make any parabolics out there that dont raise your ride up?I need to replace just my rear springs but dont want the rover to looked "jacked up".I like my stock tires.
    CTROVER-

    If your curent suspension is wasted, mine was, 3 out of 4 springs with at least 1 broken leaf in it, a new suspension will probably sit a little higher. I went with a standard 88 set of springs. 9 leaf front 11 leaf rear if I remember correctly. But the new suspension didn't look "jacked up" at all. My tires are 235x85x16 and look fine. My suspension has @ 6000 miles on it now, My friend who also has a '64 2A put a set of parabolics on his truck this year. The height of the bodies between both trucks is within 1/2 inch of each other. We both thought the paras would sit a couple of inches higher than a standard suspension but it didn't. He also runs 235x85s. I don't know what brand springs he went with but I'll see if he can post up some information.

    Jeff

    My buddy says his parabolics are made by "Rocky Mountain." 2 leaf front, 3 leaf rear.
    Last edited by badvibes; 08-30-2007 at 05:32 PM.
    1964 Series 2A SW, LHD mostly stock, often runs!

    1991 Range Rover Hunter

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Albuquerque
    Posts
    1,226

    Default

    the paras ride alot smoother in my opinion. no offense jeff
    '64 Series IIA 88 Canvas Tilt
    '68 Series IIA RHD Ambulance
    '76 Spitfire 1500
    '07 LR3 (Series Recovery Vehicle)

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    New Mexico
    Posts
    364

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by scott
    the paras ride alot smoother in my opinion. no offense jeff
    None taken! I agree!

    Jeff
    1964 Series 2A SW, LHD mostly stock, often runs!

    1991 Range Rover Hunter

  8. #8

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by PH4
    I think it would make a big difference on a military chasis.
    CTrover - is is a military chassis?

    Regards,
    Tom P.
    1965 exMoD 109
    1995 RRC LWB w/EAS

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
About us
Unparalleled product knowledge. Our mission is to support all original Land Rover models no longer supported by your local Land Rover franchise. We offer the entire range of Land Rover Genuine Parts direct from Land Rover UK, as well as publish North America's largest Land Rover publication, Rovers Magazine.
Join us