Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: many questions about IIA brakes

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    32

    Default many questions about IIA brakes

    To start:
    This concerns my not-for-show 1962 IIA 88.
    I have already spent a bunch of time reading various threads and other sites like TeriAnn's page.
    My original brake master cyl is dead and my (shared) reservoir isn't far behind.
    Before the master cyl died I could lock up my wheels, thus stock output was sufficient.


    My questions:
    What is the general success rate of rebuilding the original unit? I had success rebuilding other makes/models but some are always quirkier than others.
    I'm confused of the lineage of brake mastercyl's. I don't want to upgrade to a servo (power) system. I'd really like the dual circuit system, but can't discern if the dual circuit system was only in conjunction with the servo.
    Is the CV (later) better than the CB (earlier) and what's required to change over?
    If I'm buying a new master cyl, how about upsizing to the one for the 109? How much less feel would I get?
    Has anyone found another make/model that exchanges favorably (there's quite the U-pull yard near here..and all I need is the slightest excuse to go)?

    ANd finally reservoirs: Assuming that I don't upgrade to dual circuit (else I'll have a bunch of add'l questions) what are the reservoir options? I've seen the updated metal one at BP which requires a new line, but I'd prefer the plastic one which is listed as NLA by the hosts. Any other options?

    Thanks!

  2. #2

    Default

    The original metal one is still being made. It was a cross over from triumphs (or another UK Marque). The folks on the Series 2 BBS provided a contact on where to get one. Might be pricey due to the exchange rate and shipping though.

    I'll dig the link up.

  3. #3

    Default

    1) Depends largely on the condition of the bore. If its damaged or pitted beyond honing replace it or sleave it. Aside from that, your sucess will depend largely on the quality of the rubber parts you use.
    2) The dual circuit systems were used in conjunction with the servo on factory applications.
    3)The later CV is no better its just cheaper to manufacture and therefore less expensive.
    4)The 109 master will give you more volume but less line pressure (see bernoulli)
    5)any master with the same bore and stroke will work. Ive seen many different ones used from GM, willwood, volvo, subaru etc etc
    6) Get an original metal one. The plastic one has a rubber hose for the low pressure line which is not very neat.


    Good luck and happy stopping

    Regards
    -Ike




    What is the general success rate of rebuilding the original unit? I had success rebuilding other makes/models but some are always quirkier than others.
    I'm confused of the lineage of brake mastercyl's. I don't want to upgrade to a servo (power) system. I'd really like the dual circuit system, but can't discern if the dual circuit system was only in conjunction with the servo.
    Is the CV (later) better than the CB (earlier) and what's required to change over?
    If I'm buying a new master cyl, how about upsizing to the one for the 109? How much less feel would I get?
    Has anyone found another make/model that exchanges favorably (there's quite the U-pull yard near here..and all I need is the slightest excuse to go)?

    ANd finally reservoirs: Assuming that I don't upgrade to dual circuit (else I'll have a bunch of add'l questions) what are the reservoir options? I've seen the updated metal one at BP which requires a new line, but I'd prefer the plastic one which is listed as NLA by the hosts. Any other options?
    Last edited by leafsprung; 02-18-2008 at 10:43 AM.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    2,020

    Default

    So, to clarify:- you are looking to replace the original with the:-

    1) Least expense,
    2) Ease of replacement for the future
    3) To improve the effiecency of the braking system.

    To maintain the system as it is , would be the easiest, stocks for this should be good for many years to come (PLC228 priced at $79.95).
    To upgrade to the 109" (1" internal bore as to the 88" 7/8"), would not make that much of an improvement, unless you had 11" front brakes also.

    The plastic reservoir kit, is currently NLA, we are looking to resource them in the near future.
    RN does have a source on used, if this would work.

    Hope this is of assistance,

    Regards
    Les Parker
    Tech. Support and Parts Specialist
    Rovers North Inc.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
About us
Unparalleled product knowledge. Our mission is to support all original Land Rover models no longer supported by your local Land Rover franchise. We offer the entire range of Land Rover Genuine Parts direct from Land Rover UK, as well as publish North America's largest Land Rover publication, Rovers Magazine.
Join us