Page 9 of 9 FirstFirst ... 789
Results 81 to 89 of 89

Thread: New tire questions

  1. #81
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    384

    Default

    What is the tallest, skinniest 15" tire that can be run without looking strange?
    1965 109 2door hardtop (restored years ago)
    1971 88 (restored and as new)
    1967 88 (the next project)

  2. #82
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Kingsport
    Posts
    613

    Default

    I'd say, the 33x9.5R15 would probably be the 'best' tall n' skinny 15" for a Series. Any taller, you'll have to compensate for, I'd expect.
    -L

    '72 SIII SW 88"
    '60 SII 88" RHD

  3. #83

    Default Overkill Tires unless you live in MN like me

    Here is what I will be running on my NADA 109....

    Probably overkill but yesterday in MN some areas got 14 inches of snow and it is -14 deg as we speak brrrrr.......

    My beer froze on me while working on my rover in my garage.....

    Nokian Hakkapeliitta

    What the reviewers like:


    • Great on snow and ice
    • Studded tire for cars, SUVs, minivans and light trucks

    What the reviewers don't like:


    • Braking performance on dry or wet pavement
    • Noisy on dry pavement
    • Expensive

    Nokian Hakkapeliitta 5 review highlights

    If winter in your area is relentlessly harsh, experts recommend the studded Nokian Hakkapeliitta 5 more than any other tire. Its metal teeth grab icy, snowy roads better than studless tires -- and most other studded tires -- in tests. However, critics note that the Hakkapeliitta 5 isn't the best choice for areas with milder winters; its studded tread can't grip wet or dry asphalt as well as top-rated studless tires such as the Michelin X-Ice Xi2 (*est. $90). The Hakkapeliitta 5 is also expensive, reviews point out. A less costly studded snow tire is the Pirelli Winter Carving (*est. $90), which gets good reviews from consumers. Be aware that some areas restrict the use of studded snow tires because they can damage road surfaces.

    -Tim
    Series 111 109
    Series 11 109 NADA (in transit)
    Series 11a 109 (in pieces)

    90 RRC County- Winter warrior
    98 Disco-Family truckster

  4. #84
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Mystic CT,
    Posts
    583

    Default

    interco makes a 34x9.50 (as listed in Four Wheeler magazine), will a series truck be able to clear those? w/ or w/o parabolics?

  5. #85
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    384

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Leslie View Post
    I'd say, the 33x9.5R15 would probably be the 'best' tall n' skinny 15" for a Series. Any taller, you'll have to compensate for, I'd expect.
    What is the size cross over?
    1965 109 2door hardtop (restored years ago)
    1971 88 (restored and as new)
    1967 88 (the next project)

  6. #86
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Flagstaff, Arizona
    Posts
    1,087

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LaneRover View Post
    I have always heard that the big reason Rover went with 15" rims in the US was tire availability at the time. There just weren't a big selection of 16" tires here.
    Rover came standard with 15 inch wheels on the earlier SIIA 88's (16 inch was an option) but 109's were always 16 inch wheels. 15 inch wheels have been discontinued for some time. The standard 15 inch factory tyre diameter was 28". The standard 109 factory tyre diameter was 32 inches. The little tyres made the 88 more "peppy" on the tarmac.

    Since I drive under mostly different conditions (very seldom in snow) I'm not qualified to make a best tyre suggestion. However I tried a set of all-terrains once and found their performance in mud with a noticable clay content to be abysmal. They were OK as long as there was enough friction in the soil.

  7. #87
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Phoenix AZ
    Posts
    1,358

    Default

    A minor point. From the late SIIA manual the OEM tyre size was 7.00X15 which works out as 29" dia. Finding a tyre in that size now is almost impossible.

  8. #88
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    384

    Default

    Thanks for the help TeriAnn. The tire is for a 1971 88". I decided to go with a Denman express highway tire from Universal Tire. They had a 670/15 which equates to a 29.10 tall. That should be pretty close to an original look in my estimation. It is an old looking bias ply tire that is pretty narrow. I will post pics once they are mounted if anyone is interested. I plan on using these tires for over-road only. I have a set of 16'' wheels for my off-road tires.
    1965 109 2door hardtop (restored years ago)
    1971 88 (restored and as new)
    1967 88 (the next project)

  9. #89

    Default

    Rover came standard with 15 inch wheels on the earlier SIIA 88's (16 inch was an option) but 109's were always 16 inch wheels. 15 inch wheels have been discontinued for some time. The standard 15 inch factory tyre diameter was 28".

    late 66 was the first year for factory fitted 15s. There was only one more year of 109 sales in the US So all rovers sold in the US after 67 got 15s. There were a few stock sizes, but the most common was the 7.10x15 which is tough to get. The 7.00x15 is readily available from a number of manufacturers in several tread designs

    -Ike

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
About us
Unparalleled product knowledge. Our mission is to support all original Land Rover models no longer supported by your local Land Rover franchise. We offer the entire range of Land Rover Genuine Parts direct from Land Rover UK, as well as publish North America's largest Land Rover publication, Rovers Magazine.
Join us