best source for a 3.5L

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • rejeep
    4th Gear
    • Apr 2010
    • 420

    best source for a 3.5L

    again toying around with ideas...
    What is the best outlet for the earlier carb version of the engine?
    1971 SIIa 88" NAS Dauntles V6
    1974 SIII 109" RHD
  • Terrys
    Overdrive
    • May 2007
    • 1382

    #2
    Hey Arie, I've got a good 3.9 shortblock you're welcome to. It's been sitting in the front of the carriage house for a couple years without heads, so it'l need honing. I have a couple sets of heads, but no carbed intakes.

    Comment

    • siiirhd88
      3rd Gear
      • Oct 2006
      • 360

      #3
      I've used an injected 3.9 V8 converted to a 4V carb on two of my Series trucks. There are lots of 3.9s around, compared to 3.5 availability. On both trucks I used an Edelbrock intake with a Holley 600 carb, and replaced the Rover distributor with a Mallory Unilite. Neither truck has required ignition or carb maintenance in a few years of use.

      Bob


      Originally posted by rejeep
      again toying around with ideas...
      What is the best outlet for the earlier carb version of the engine?

      Comment

      • mongoswede
        5th Gear
        • May 2010
        • 757

        #4
        I have a 3.5 sitting in my parts range rover....runs well...its injected though.

        Comment

        • 109 Pretender
          1st Gear
          • Oct 2008
          • 110

          #5
          The 3.5 isn't as common as a 3.9 and the 3.9 has a better block. You could easily fit the 3.5 valve covers and obtain a dual SU manifold off ebay. My 109 has a "carbed" 3.9 and I personally like the SU setup. From what I understand, the 4 barrel carb setups always seem to have some drivability issues.

          The SU manifolds are fairly common in US because of the old Rover 3500. I think I paid about 300.00 for a spare setup a few years ago from ebay. I converted to a manual choke.

          I wouldn't recommend using the LR series trans. though. Timm Cooper is building me a NP435 to series transfer adapter as I write this - after a year of waiting for Ike to get his version built, I had to move on...

          Good Luck!

          Comment

          • Firemanshort
            2nd Gear
            • Nov 2006
            • 282

            #6
            I am in the 3.5 owners circle. This is the motor that lauched a thousand Rovers (cars and trucks). I may take exception with the notion that the 3.9 has the better block. It can be argued a lot of different ways but a 3.5 will never pull up laim with a slipped liner.

            I am rebuilding my 3.5 (instead of going BIG for a 3.9, 4.0 or the 4.6). For a Series class rover (think light and simple) the 3.5 with either the SU or the Edelbrock if fine. It is all I have had and I keep up with the coiled-crowd - on highway and off.

            Depending on a few things - that 3.5 EFI rangie motor could be swapped to a carb and run quite well. It would lose some of the EFI magic but gain a ton of simplicity. I know there are many wrenchers on the BBS circuit that swear a simple EFI set up is not hard - but I am very happy with my old fashioned carb.

            As far as sources... look up D&D Fabrication for a top shelf engine (www.aluminumv8.com). RPI in the UK is another source. Both are a little spendy but are high quality operations. Look in your friend's sheds for great donor 3.9's. You can occasionally find a junkyard Range Rover 3.5 (EFI). The Rover 3500 sedans are rarer but that same motor again. Also search on Buick 215 - 1963 Buick Special, among others (same motor) - there are a few rebuilders that list a Buick 215 crate engine that you could do something with.

            The magic to stay with a dizzy and not go to electronics and EFI is in the timing cover. The newer motor (4.0's or 4.6's) timing covers do not support the CARB and dizzy setup. The older timing covers will transplant but are a little tough to find for a good price.
            Firemanshort
            1980 Stage One
            (Past owner of 1973 Series III - Highlander)

            Comment

            • junkyddog11
              1st Gear
              • Feb 2007
              • 195

              #7
              I have 3.5's / 3.9's (personally I'd use the 3.9, de tuned a little. It is difficult to tell the difference between 3.5 / 3.9 / 4.0) I have carbs, manifolds, injection systems (I've had great success with hotwire EFI transplants). In fact I have way too much. Will be clearing out a ton of engines / parts soon.
              Matt Browne
              www.overlandengineering.com
              "resurecting junk through engineering"

              Comment

              • rejeep
                4th Gear
                • Apr 2010
                • 420

                #8
                Originally posted by junkyddog11
                I have 3.5's / 3.9's (personally I'd use the 3.9, de tuned a little. It is difficult to tell the difference between 3.5 / 3.9 / 4.0) I have carbs, manifolds, injection systems (I've had great success with hotwire EFI transplants). In fact I have way too much. Will be clearing out a ton of engines / parts soon.

                Matt..
                I spoke to you on the phone yesterday
                1971 SIIa 88" NAS Dauntles V6
                1974 SIII 109" RHD

                Comment

                • rejeep
                  4th Gear
                  • Apr 2010
                  • 420

                  #9
                  [QUOTE=Firemanshort;63812] Also search on Buick 215 - 1963 Buick Special, among others (same motor) - there are a few rebuilders that list a Buick 215 crate engine that you could do something with.[QUOTE]

                  is the bellhousing the samae? I thought it was re tooled.. I can get one of thoes motors easy...
                  1971 SIIa 88" NAS Dauntles V6
                  1974 SIII 109" RHD

                  Comment

                  • yorker
                    Overdrive
                    • Nov 2006
                    • 1635

                    #10
                    [QUOTE=rejeep;63827][QUOTE=Firemanshort;63812] Also search on Buick 215 - 1963 Buick Special, among others (same motor) - there are a few rebuilders that list a Buick 215 crate engine that you could do something with.

                    is the bellhousing the samae? I thought it was re tooled.. I can get one of thoes motors easy...

                    Rover used the Buick/Olds 215's bolt pattern which was unique to that Aluminum 215 V8 (non BOP pattern).




                    It would be a fun engine in a flatfender. In a Rover I honestly think you could do a lot better.
                    1965 SIIa 88",1975 Ex-MOD 109/Ambulance, 1989 RRC, blah, blah, blah...

                    Land Rover UK Forums

                    Comment

                    • junkyddog11
                      1st Gear
                      • Feb 2007
                      • 195

                      #11
                      Ahh yes. Not sure how I missed that 'cause I read the whole post ....honest.

                      Nice chatting with you Arie.
                      Matt Browne
                      www.overlandengineering.com
                      "resurecting junk through engineering"

                      Comment

                      Working...