Land Cruiser vs. Series

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • farmerdave
    Low Range
    • Oct 2010
    • 15

    Land Cruiser vs. Series

    So when I was in Botswana on a fishing trip, my guide had very definite opinions about which was better in the bush. We were in a Toy 75 pickup, so you can figure out his opinion. Why should I choose a series truck, which I favor for no reason other than I like them and have wanted one for years?
    "A strong mind defeats many" - Genghis Khan
  • superstator
    2nd Gear
    • Aug 2008
    • 298

    #2
    Because you like them and have wanted one for years.
    '67 109 NADA #413 - rebuilding w/ TDI & galvy chassis.

    Comment

    • I Leak Oil
      Overdrive
      • Nov 2006
      • 1796

      #3
      They are both good vehicles, each in their own way. If you ask that question on a brand specific BBS you're bound to get skewed answers from the brand faithfull. Personally, I don't feel the need to convince anyone to buy a rover. Either you want one or you don't. Cruisers are bought by the practical, rovers are bought by those who are practical and passionate!
      Jason
      "Clubs are for Chumps" Club president

      Comment

      • badvibes
        3rd Gear
        • Mar 2007
        • 364

        #4
        Run what you like. Rover, Jeep, Toyota, Warn, Ramsey, etc, etc, they all break down, they all will get stuck if you run them hard enough. That's what a good friend told me once, a guy who runs hard and has rolled and winched all of them. So pick what you like. Let us know what you decide. If it's a Rover there is a lot of support available on this board.

        Jeff
        1964 Series 2A SW, LHD mostly stock, often runs!

        1991 Range Rover Hunter

        Comment

        • rejeep
          4th Gear
          • Apr 2010
          • 420

          #5
          after being a jeep guy my entire life I recently bought and partially restored my first land rover..

          I have to say.. the first difference that comes to mind is "rugged simplicity"...

          Rovers are much more apt to be field maintained, repaired, and cobbled together in the event of a breakdown..

          While I feel more comfortable with a jeep in terms of mechanical work, I feel I would be able to do more with my rover with less equipment..
          1971 SIIa 88" NAS Dauntles V6
          1974 SIII 109" RHD

          Comment

          • Lawrie
            Low Range
            • Jul 2007
            • 51

            #6
            I have owned both -I loved my old FJ40, the 6 cyl torque (a great engine -copied from chevy). The Cruiser did what i asked of it, but is bigger, heavier steering, more open slop around space in drivers compartment and steel bodied.
            I have been in Rovers -Series, Defenders, tdi's,.. and like the feel better (as stated above so much of this is personal) but also find suppprt in the north east/parts, stuff is better for Rovers (Texas and Calif. better for Toyota), more options in rover, more models, more variations: easier to take a hardtop off a Rover -convert to pick up for an errand,..
            Once you get to Rover TDI's then you have wonderful torque, effeciency, and low maintenance.
            my thoughts.

            Comment

            • leafsprung
              Overdrive
              • Nov 2006
              • 1008

              #7
              rover advantages:

              -lower center of gravity
              -better parts availability
              -better literature availability (parts manuals for cruisers are very difficult to find.
              -dont have that silly tapered cab where your knee hits the window winder
              -less rust prone (if thats possible)
              -market is typically a little stronger for the rover.
              -more varied models available (swb pickup,fc etc,)
              -tops are interchangeable
              -stronger t-case
              -parts interchangeability is greater over more years

              Cruiser advantages:

              -more power
              -longer front springs
              -stronger axles
              -good aftermarket support for more varied drivetrain options
              - body has fewer components and is less prone to rattles and sqeaks
              -better seating
              -continued to develop over time getting discs/power steering etc

              Comment

              • amcordo
                5th Gear
                • Jun 2009
                • 740

                #8
                S*%ts gonna break on this thing and it's going to drive you nuts and poor at times - unless you're miraculous at everything on Earth. So it better just be...


                Originally posted by superstator
                Because you like them and have wanted one for years.

                +1+1+1+1+1+1+1

                Comment

                • farmerdave
                  Low Range
                  • Oct 2010
                  • 15

                  #9
                  Exactly what I was looking for. Rover bias. 109 it will be.
                  "A strong mind defeats many" - Genghis Khan

                  Comment

                  • I Leak Oil
                    Overdrive
                    • Nov 2006
                    • 1796

                    #10
                    Originally posted by farmerdave
                    Exactly what I was looking for. Rover bias. 109 it will be.
                    Welcome to the insanity!
                    Jason
                    "Clubs are for Chumps" Club president

                    Comment

                    • Billy5
                      1st Gear
                      • Aug 2010
                      • 172

                      #11
                      This is a good thread. I am buying my first Rover next week. 1969 series 2a. I have to say that from what I read and saw, it is the raw, basic go anywhere purpose of them. Just look at the driving instruction video on youtube. No pavement to be found. I have had cruisers before that. Loved it. But I am sure I will love this as well. I also like the fact they are aluminum, et..My research has shown me that both are based off the Willys Overland. My biggest problem with the cruiser scene is the fact that every other one i see has a v8. Why take out what was good and almost bullet proof? That is what makes a cruiser a cruiser or a rover a rover. My opinion is they are also overpriced. Well, most not all. I look forward to spending lots of time with my series. It will be my dd, and part of the family.
                      1969 Series 2a Bugeye

                      Comment

                      • LaneRover
                        Overdrive
                        • Oct 2006
                        • 1743

                        #12
                        My brother Peter - who got me into Rovers and has owned Jeeps, cruisers and Rovers said, "The Jeep was the best down the highway, the cruiser was OK on the highway and OK off-road, the Rover was the best off-road."

                        Brent
                        1958 107 SW - Sold to a better home
                        1965 109 SW - nearly running well
                        1966 88 SW - running but needing attention
                        1969 109 P-UP

                        http://www.facebook.com/album.php?ai...2&l=64cfe23aa2

                        Comment

                        • msggunny
                          5th Gear
                          • Jan 2007
                          • 621

                          #13
                          My buddy who runs a game farm in Zimbabwe has a 109 and he hates it, drives his LC all the time. Gives me **** about it all the time. Guy i hunted with in Limpopo South Africa had same deal, he just left his 109 to rot. Father in law wont touch a rover and drives LC's (he lives in Zimbabwe), oddly enough his shop rebuilt my 88's engine.

                          The people i met in Africa who had rovers and loved them would drive nothing else. I think the biggest issue is the individual and his/her choice in the matter. Both break.

                          Its like our Ford vs Chevy thing over here.
                          First but gone: 91 3 door Disco "White Rhino"
                          77 Series III 88 ex MoD "Shongololo"
                          Gone and I miss her: 97 D1 5 speed
                          04 DII
                          08 D3 (LR3)

                          Comment

                          • I Leak Oil
                            Overdrive
                            • Nov 2006
                            • 1796

                            #14
                            Originally posted by msggunny
                            Its like our Ford vs Chevy thing over here.
                            What? That's no contest....Chebby all the way.....
                            Jason
                            "Clubs are for Chumps" Club president

                            Comment

                            • yorker
                              Overdrive
                              • Nov 2006
                              • 1635

                              #15
                              Just buy a stage 1 109, that will more or less get you a 109 with decent ability on highway when needed as well as the simplicity of a series. Land Cruisers are great but you obviously have your heart set on a Land Rover so go for it- otherwise you'll always be wondering what it is like to own one.
                              1965 SIIa 88",1975 Ex-MOD 109/Ambulance, 1989 RRC, blah, blah, blah...

                              Land Rover UK Forums

                              Comment

                              Working...