PDA

View Full Version : Is it possible?



garycox
12-17-2011, 09:20 PM
I am new to Land Rovers and have already learned a lot just lurking here. Thanks.

I am thinking I would like to get into a series I or II. One of my concerns is what I read here re top speeds. I would like to be able to safely travel on major highways on occasion.

Is it possible to make a early land rover cruise safely at 70mph? Would just a OD unit get the job done or would more be required? I am not interested in non rover engine swaps, I want something that mostly looks somewhat original.


Thanks for your insights.

Gary

Rat Patrol
12-17-2011, 09:27 PM
i wouldn't advise running it that hard for long periods. 65 is as hard as i've pushed mine and that is a bit nerve racking.

canyonero
12-17-2011, 10:02 PM
I had a '99 Disco II that I didn't really enjoy on the highways above 50 mph, so my current Series III is even less comfortable at cruising speeds. I guess I just got got used to my wife's Subaru for fifth gear travel...I've always felt that Land Rovers seem to feel instantly better once they turn off pavement and hit dirt, so I'm not sure there's any way to make a Series feel "comfortable" on pavement. I love mine, but don't have to take it on the Interstate..

leafsprung
12-17-2011, 11:28 PM
Ive driven everywhere in the US in a series land rover from east coast to west coast NY to LA, dixie to the PNW and never found that I HAD to go 70mph. I regularly take trips in stock 2.0L series ones with 50-55 mph cruise without issue. While a series rover in good shape can pull 70, its not really necessary unless your in a hurry and a land rover really isnt the best car if you are in a hurry.

SafeAirOne
12-18-2011, 05:18 AM
I drive my underpowered 109 30 highway miles to and from work 5 days a week at 55mph. Been doing it for years. It's plenty safe and I've never had any complaints from anyone behind me.

Besides, why worry about people behind you? I figure that it's a 2 (or more) lane highway and they have accelerator pedals, turn signals and a steering wheels should they not want to be behind a series rover doing 55.

Jim-ME
12-18-2011, 05:42 AM
My Rover with an OD will cruise at 65 but I don't like to push it like that. Even with the OD I prefer 55. I use 4 lane highways as much as I can to allow people to go around. I have been known to pull over on 2 lane roads to let people by. Usually people are staring so much they don't mind going slow for a while. OTOH my son's Jeep with a 4 cylinder engine and a 5 speed really doesn't like much over 55 either.
Jim

scatterling
12-18-2011, 07:16 AM
The 109" that I rebuilt will travel at highway speeds without any issues ( except long hills). Nothing fancy ( although all rebuilt) stock engine and gearbox. It does have an overdrive, parabolics and disc brakes. I've had it up to 73 (according to GPS) and it felt stable. It will run at 65-67 comfortably without feeling like it wants to run off the road or fall apart.
I guess it all depends on how you set it up and what upgrades you do.

TeriAnn
12-18-2011, 08:59 AM
I regularly take trips in stock 2.0L series ones with 50-55 mph cruise without issue. While a series rover in good shape can pull 70, its not really necessary unless your in a hurry and a land rover really isnt the best car if you are in a hurry.

I love data.

Series Land Rover with stock gearing, 32 inch dia tyres. With and without Roverdrive. Top gear:

MPH____STOCK RPM____ROVERDRIVE RPM

55__________3112_________2479
60__________3402_________2724
65__________3686_________2951
70__________3973_________3178
75__________4226_________3405

Land Rover specs a fresh Series III 2.25L engine with 8:1 head is 70 hp@4000 RPM and 120 lbft @2000 RPM. The factory doesn't specify redline that I have ever seen, but the highest RPM I have seen specified is 4225 RPM. So 75 MPH is close to the guessed at red line. These numbers are for a factory fresh engine and not a high mileage engine like many of us drive.

It has been my experience from driving my 109 with a 2.15 engine for about 20 years that the engine has a highway cruise sweet spot of around 3200 to 3300 RPM where it can happily cruise all day. I think that is why people pretty much refer to Series trucks as being 50-55 MPH highway cruisers. In general the slower you cruise on the highway the better your fuel mileage.

If you look at the numbers with overdrive installed it looks like the perfect solution. And indeed it would be if one did not take into account the anemic output of even a fresh 2.25L petrol engine.

Having put a lot of highway miles on a SIII 8:1 compression engine & an overdrive I have found that even at full throttle sometimes the engine just does not have enough power to push top gear that the higher speeds. And the engine really sucks fuel at full throttle or even close to full throttle.

Slight inclines, high altitude driving or headwinds will keep you from achieving the high speeds. But a tail wind or slight decline & you are there.

To take proper advantage of an overdrive at high speeds you really need to power range of a 200 or 300tdi.

If you are going for the higher speeds, you really should have the steering in very good condition, proper alignment to within factory specs, wheel bearings properly adjusted and wheels properly lug balanced. The trucks can be very stable at 75 MPH or if they need attention can be unstable and hard to control much above 50 MPH.

Bottom line is that a healthy well adjusted stock truck can do 75 MPH under certain driving conditions but you are right on the edge of the engine's ability and maybe not the best place for a long distance cruise.

My recommendation for a stock rig is 55 MPH freeway speed is your best bet for long drives. 65 MPH works for those times when you are in a hurry and driving a short distance but your fuel mileage will noticeably suffer.

When you have to open up the throttle to get the engine to push the overdrive at higher speeds your fuel mileage can really suffer. And under many conditions the power is just not there to push the overdrive at high speeds. There are reasons that Land Rover gave up on the petrol 4 cylinder engine and went with the tdis. I suspect highway cruising ability was one of them.




http://www.tjwakeman.net/1dancing_santas.gif

jac04
12-18-2011, 09:20 AM
I installed a Roverdrive on my Lightweight with great intentions of being able to cruise at 70mph. Fresh engine, suspension & steering components. Basically, read what TeriAnn wrote. It will cruise at 70-75mph no problem except for steeper grades. However, I find myself still cruising at 60-65mph and enjoying a much more 'relaxed' drive and better fuel economy. The vehicle seems much happier at those speeds as well. Like Ike said, a Land Rover isn't the best vehicle to drive if you're in a hurry.

kwd509
12-18-2011, 11:57 AM
Interesting thread, to redirect for a brief moment; Is it true that the older 2.25 three bearing diesel will come apart if it is regularly asked to do more than 50 mph?

Partsman
12-18-2011, 12:31 PM
Gary if you just have to have 70-75mph in your Land Rover, might I suggest swapping out your 2.25liter petrol either for a tdi or a six pot and installing 3.9 diffs, with this combo you can achieve the speeds you're looking for. Now that that's said, I should point out that these motors were never engineered to run these conditions, and it might well behoove you to look into a more modern vehicle for your higher cruising speeds. Read carefully everything that TerriAnn has written above, as she does know what she's talking about, her website should put to bed any doubts you may have on that end of things. http://www.expeditionlandrover.info/ (http://www.expeditionlandrover.info/)
Remember above all else, be safe and have fun! That's what these vehicles are all about. :thumb-up:

antichrist
12-18-2011, 12:43 PM
Besides, why worry about people behind you? I figure that it's a 2 (or more) lane highway and they have accelerator pedals, turn signals and a steering wheels should they not want to be behind a series rover doing 55.You would think.
I've lost count of the times on nearly empty multi-lanes that I've watched people in my rear view mirror gain on me rapidly, them doing 70 or so to my 55/60, only have them to slow down and drive along right behind me for miles. :rolleyes:

My 88's I've always driven 55-65 on the highway without issue.

mearstrae
12-18-2011, 05:13 PM
OK, my 2 cents worth... I have a Series Hybrid with a 3.5 and over drive, since it's a R.R. drive train it has higher gearing than most. It is capable of doing (belive it or not...) about 80 (or more) mph on the highways. But... It isn't a good idea, these are not roadcars they are working trucks (or more to the point working tractors...) and are not safe at high speeds. The suspension isn't suited nor are the brakes. Leaf springs, high center of gavity and drum brakes are a recipe for disaster, let alone; even if you run radial tires....

'95 R.R. Classic LWB
'76 Series III Hybrid 109
'70 Rover 3500S

Billy5
12-18-2011, 05:42 PM
Hmm. Well heres my take..lol. I bought a series for what it is. It is basically a tractor with a body on it. They weren't designed with highways in mind ( from what I am gathering in my short time). I have no intentions of trying to make it what it wasnt supposed to be. I could spend thousands on new springs etc..but I ask myself why? But I have had mine up to 62 mph wide open with overdrive by gps. I really dont think these engines really like sonic revs. So my happy spot is around 50. Shes happy singing along, engine smooth etc. and I feel very comfortable at that speed. I go into the right lane and stay there. I cant ask more from a 40 year old, off road truck...:)

Terrys
12-18-2011, 06:05 PM
The three previous posts are right on the money; the 88 is not a safe vehicle much over 60. A 109 is a different animal with regard to handling, but no better, if not worse, at stopping. Add in the dynamics of an old front end with likely issues, and they just aren't stable at high speed.

TedW
12-18-2011, 06:58 PM
The three previous posts are right on the money; the 88 is not a safe vehicle much over 60. A 109 is a different animal with regard to handling, but no better, if not worse, at stopping. Add in the dynamics of an old front end with likely issues, and they just aren't stable at high speed.

X2 on the above. My 1970 IIA (new engine & front end, OD, 16" sneakers) does a comfy 50-55mph on secondary roads - such as my yearly 5 hour trip to the British Invasion in Stowe VT. I can more than keep up with traffic (except for those nasty uphill climbs) and the trip is quite pleasant.

On the other hand, interstate driving is a real drag: When lucky, you have your truck wound right up to 65 (with a tail wind - God help you if there's a headwind), and most of the time you have traffic passing you, with the associated roar of their engines and tires - and you hear every bit of it.

Just my opinion.

garycox
12-18-2011, 07:21 PM
Thanks for all the insight and replies. All the info and real world experience is what I was looking for.

disco2hse
12-18-2011, 08:00 PM
I had a '99 Disco II that I didn't really enjoy on the highways above 50 mph,

Seriously?? I normally cruise at 105km/hr in my Disco 2 TD5. Over 140km/hr and it is not so good (big heavy vehicle). That'd be 65m/hr and 87m/hr in old money.

The 109 I normally cruise at around 95-105km/hr, or roughly 60-65m/hr. It does have a V8, but standard gearing.

canyonero
12-19-2011, 08:34 AM
I would drive it on the Interstate at around 75mph, it just wasn't that pleasant, too loud with the tires...

LR Max
12-19-2011, 08:46 AM
While my 109 is capable of 70 mph, it seems to really like 62 mph quite well. I've got stock gearing (for a series 3) and an overdrive. 235/85/16 tires. I've got a worked over and strong 2.25 gasser engine under the hood.

I HIGHLY RECOMMEND good seats, good tires (swapping from bias ply to radial is AMAZING) and a set of noise cancelling earphones. You can use earplugs but rocking out while driving is far more enjoyable.

TedW
12-19-2011, 09:13 AM
While my 109 is capable of 70 mph, it seems to really like 62 mph quite well. I've got stock gearing (for a series 3) and an overdrive. 235/85/16 tires. I've got a worked over and strong 2.25 gasser engine under the hood.

I HIGHLY RECOMMEND good seats, good tires (swapping from bias ply to radial is AMAZING) and a set of noise cancelling earphones. You can use earplugs but rocking out while driving is far more enjoyable.

Noise cancelling headphones are a great idea, but check your local statutes: IIRC it is illegal in some states to wear headphones while driving.

mongoswede
12-19-2011, 09:23 AM
a friend has a GMC yukon that we have used as a tow vehicle for a couple of motorcycle races. On the interstate 65 mph feels just right. Between 65 and 75 there is a noticeable increase in fuel consumption. In a 55 or 60 would be plenty on the interstate. The wind noise alone inside the cab due to the aerodynamics of a barn is quite loud. At those speeds just stick to the slow lane and I don't think it will be so much of an issue.

greenmeanie
12-19-2011, 09:26 AM
I can't speak for others but I used to commute 1000miles a week between Phoenix and Tucson in my 88 for 2-3 years. She typically ran 32" mud tyres or light truck ATs, later dual circuit servo 10" drums, Roverdrive and 2.25 with Rochester and Turner 8:1 head and was otherwise a bog standard 71IIA 88 hard top. I ran 65mph up hills, 70mph everywhere else, 75mph with a tail wind on a good day. She sat at 3400 odd rpm for 3 hours a day and those weeks I pulled the Roverdrive she would run at 4000rpm. The engine didn't have a problem with it. It was not a great vehicle to make my commute in but needs must as the alternative was a 101 on bar grips.

Tinitis (sp?) and temporary deafness is a real risk after prolonged high speed travel in a series.

With all that running flat out fuel consumption was horrendous. It actually gets much better if you find a big rig to trail. They make a very big hole in the air and you can feel a noticeable effect when you enter their bubble which extends much further back than you would otherwise imagine.

I was always aware that it wasn't a modern car so I always maintained my braking distances but I hardly felt unsafe at speed. The drums would lock up just fine so the problem was not braking power but, as we all know, merely making sure that I could out brake the guy in front given our seperation. Stability was adequate for the type of vehicle and steering never felt vague/wandering or otherwise dangerous. I did keep on top of my maintenance but that should be the case with any vehicle on the highway.

Having run a few different treads from road bias to mud the type of tyre you choose makes a pretty big difference to on road driveability. That sounds obvious but a lot of people (including myself at times) buy tyres based on appearance rather than actual use.

It is not a modern car and it is not as safew as a modern car but well maintained and set up with a road bias there is no reason you can't drive at 70mph. It won't be comforatable. Ike's comment is, however, on the mark unless you are a real glutton for punishment.

LR Max
12-19-2011, 10:59 AM
Noise cancelling headphones are a great idea, but check your local statutes: IIRC it is illegal in some states to wear headphones while driving.

True. However, earbuds FOR THE WIN!!!

Also I can assure you, I can still hear everything that is going on around me. Its just at a reasonable noise level rather than at Boeing-747-at-full-throttle-on-my-face level.

o2batsea
12-19-2011, 11:50 AM
Back in the days when the 109 was bone stock with a Fairey OD, it ran at 65 on a flat road with no trouble, but at the slightest hint of an incline it would just bog down to a crawl. On some hills in PA, I was in 2nd gear with it still gasping for breath while double trailers whizzed by 4 feet away at 60 MPH, me doing 20.
That scared the schmidt out of me. It was on such a trip I vowed to swap in a V8 for the 2 1/4 D.
Today, as the 109 sits in pieces, I still sorta miss that, but I'm sure with Tdi power, R380, LT230 and RRC axles I'll get over it.

TedW
12-19-2011, 12:00 PM
True. However, earbuds FOR THE WIN!!!

Also I can assure you, I can still hear everything that is going on around me. Its just at a reasonable noise level rather than at Boeing-747-at-full-throttle-on-my-face level.

I plant to try out my Panasonics and see how they do - statutes be damned.

Skookumchuck
12-19-2011, 01:12 PM
I drive my 109 everywhere as it is my Daily driver. The PO when he did the restoration lined the floor with a ruber type matting. Even though she is running 285 75 R16 mudders you can easly carry on a conversation and listen to the CD or radio. the whole interior has been lined with carpet over the rubber matting. I also have a Ascroft conversion so in normal driving I cruise at 60-65 MPH. if you are going to drive all the time I would definatley go with some sound dampening and an overdrive. I plan on investing in a disc brake conversion as I am installing my new 200 TDI next month.

garycox
12-19-2011, 01:55 PM
Thanks everyone for all the insight.

I am ok with the cabin noise and I like drum brakes. For the most part I embrace all the shortcomings of vintage autos as part of the experience and the "crude" nature of a landy is part of the appeal for me. I just want to be able to get where i am going. I had heard that 50 or so was the top speed, sounds like 55 to 65 is doable with overdrive.

Now to find a good early series truck.

LR Max
12-19-2011, 04:05 PM
I plant to try out my Panasonics and see how they do - statutes be damned.

After 8 years of service, my Sony earbuds just died. I saw a set of noise cancelling earbuds for $35. While they don't have the best ratings, I'm seriously considering them since I KNOW I'll be tearing them up.

You'll love em. Especially since I am a firm believer that hanging my head out the window to talk on the phone is quieter than inside!

TeriAnn
12-20-2011, 07:17 AM
http://www.tjwakeman.net/1hijacked.gif



You'll love em. Especially since I am a firm believer that hanging my head out the window to talk on the phone is quieter than inside!

You know, talking on the phone while driving is a bad idea for everyone but the body shop & undertaker. This year I have narrowly missed a collision with 2 other vehicles that had oblivious drivers talking away on a hand held cell phone. Neither seemed aware that they went through red lights.

I've never understood the laws against wearing earphones while driving though. Deaf people are allowed to drive. People who drive loud trucks for a living have to wear noise canceling earphones. There is no limit to the megawatts pumped into inside car speakers. So what is the big deal about non-commerical drivers wearing earphones while driving????

Has anyone actually been pulled over for driving with earphones?



http://www.tjwakeman.net/1dancing_santas.gif

printjunky
02-06-2012, 03:55 PM
The funny thing I've noticed recently driving the Rover with earbuds in is that all the various noises change. And as we all know, a new or different noise is, or could be cause for alarm! I've ripped those things out in a panic thinking the worst, only to realize I was attenuating frequencies, which has the effect of enhancing other ("new") frequencies. Nothing was coming apart and as soon as the buds were out, it sounded perfectly normal. Panic subsided.

I'll get used to it eventually, I'm sure!

amcordo
02-06-2012, 04:02 PM
If highway speeds are important either get a different vehicle, or purchase a modified rover that's got a larger power plant in it. My V8 hits seventy miles per hour with an ashcroft high transfercase and the original transmission.

Though if you do get one with a bigger engine make sure it's also got a more robust transmission. I'm replacing the original with something that was built to handle more power.

Also, make sure you have good life/health insurance.