PDA

View Full Version : Disk Brake Conversion



gentilepiano
08-27-2012, 04:48 PM
Hello All...Has anyone installed the series disk brake conversion setup now offered by our host?
How difficult ?
pleased with the results ?
Any comments would be greatly appreciated

o2batsea
08-27-2012, 06:20 PM
If you have ever rebuilt your swivels, then that's about as difficult as this will get. There are a few considerations over and above the discs themselves. The master cylinder remains unboosted, so the foot action is about the same. You could upgrade to boosted master cylinder, which will require some body mods on the Series wings. Also, you will be better served with 16 inch wheels. This will fit in a 15 inch but there's just a scosh more room with 16s.

TeriAnn
08-28-2012, 12:32 AM
The kit is the same as Rovers North offered a few years back. It uses a swivel housing and hub designed by Timm Cooper and manufactured by ROAM OFFROAD. It is a very high quality kit. I have no hands on experience with this kit but it appears to be the same difficulty as replacing the Railco bushings. You disassemble everything down to that point then reassemble with new parts. If your bushings are old it would be a good time to replace them. Sorry I do not have a how-to web page for this conversion since I have not done one.

And yes you will want to convert to power brakes if you do not have them. I have a web page that provides an overview of common power brake conversions (http://www.expeditionlandrover.info/dual_brake_conv.htm). For an easy conversion I recommend a late IIA/III brake pedestal and Santana servo unit that is basically a Defender type 50 servo with Series rod. It is better than the 2:1 boost you get from a Series servo. A late IIA/III inner wing panel saves cutting up the wing for fit.

gentilepiano
08-28-2012, 05:48 AM
Thanks for the info
My rig is a series 3 with a dual system and a vacuum booster
The brakes are in good shape, and adjusted, but leave a lot to be desired... Still debating

I Leak Oil
08-28-2012, 08:12 AM
The brakes are in good shape, and adjusted, but leave a lot to be desired... Still debating

In good shape and adjusted.....they won't get better, only worse.
If you can stomach the cost (for any conversion, not just the RN) disc brakes are a nice addition to a series truck. You won't regret it....

TeriAnn
08-28-2012, 09:38 AM
Thanks for the info
My rig is a series 3 with a dual system and a vacuum booster
The brakes are in good shape, and adjusted, but leave a lot to be desired... Still debating

You will notice a definite improvement if you upgrade to the Santana type 50 style servo unit. This is a bolt on upgrade. Heystee automotive sells this unit. I don't think RN carries Santana parts.

I consider front disc brakes to be an important 109 brake upgrade because the stock 109 front brakes have 2 leading shoes per side which do not work well in the backwards direction. A BIG problem if you have to stop a 109 nose up on a steep grade and do not want to roll backwards. For an 88, disc brakes are good but you probably would not notice much if any braking improvement when the shoes are dry vs disc brakes. A bigger Servo is what really helps provide more braking with less pedal effort. Don't get me wrong, as I consider disc brakes to be a safety upgrade for 88s as well as a 109. Especially for wet brakes. But you really need more than the Series 2:1 servo boost to take the best advantage of disc brakes.

Your upgrade path from Series power brakes without cutting the body is either a pre 1990 Defender brake pedal assembly with Defender type 50 servo unit or a late IIA/III Series pedal assembly with a Santana type 50 style servo unit. A type 80 servo unit would require wing cutting and a deluxe bonnet.

luckyjoe
08-28-2012, 10:09 AM
You will notice a definite improvement if you upgrade to the Santana type 50 style servo unit.

Any idea what the Santana 50's boost ratio is?

Jim-ME
08-28-2012, 10:53 AM
When it comes to an 88, if one has limited funds would just getting the fronts be acceptable? I'm running a 109 MC with a standard Series booster.
Jim

ThePhotographer
08-28-2012, 11:03 AM
When it comes to an 88, if one has limited funds would just getting the fronts be acceptable? I'm running a 109 MC with a standard Series booster.
Jim

We offer a front-only kit because of the cost-issue, and because fronts do more of the stopping anyways.

I Leak Oil
08-28-2012, 11:05 AM
Jim, I only have discs in the front, original drums in the rear, 109 MC. No issues at all. Fronts do something along the lines of 70% of your braking anyway.

TeriAnn
08-28-2012, 11:14 AM
Any idea what the Santana 50's boost ratio is?

I have only seen boost specs for the Servos offered by the factory for the 88 and for the 109. But as a comparison, the Series brake servo has a 6 inch diaphragm and the Type 50 (early Defender & Santana) has a 8 inch dia diaphragm to create the boost. It is the largest that can be a bolt on direct replacement for a Series servo.

o2batsea
08-28-2012, 11:35 AM
Another less invasive option is to install 109 front brakes. The drums have more surface area. I have never felt that the drum brakes were unsafe or didn't stop well. I was always able to lock it up if I really wanted to. You have to adjust them tight. Like, set the snail cams so that you cannot turn the wheel and then back it off one notch.

superstator
08-28-2012, 11:49 AM
What exactly are the differences between the Proline and Genuine kits? They both say they have a mix of proline and genuine, so what parts exactly get "upgraded" between the two price points?

ThePhotographer
08-28-2012, 12:41 PM
Sorry for the confusion, there are no Proline parts in the Genuine kit. The only non-genuine parts in the genuine kit are the custom conversion pieces provided by Timm Cooper.

luckyjoe
08-28-2012, 12:47 PM
...the Series brake servo has a 6 inch diaphragm and the Type 50 (early Defender & Santana) has a 8 inch dia diaphragm to create the boost.

Not sure how diaphragm diameter affects boost, as remote servo's are available in various boost ratios with the similar diaphragm diameter, or occasionally higher boost with smaller diaphragm (1.9:1 = 8", 2.3:1 = 6").

derek
08-28-2012, 03:49 PM
I have the roam off road front and rears on my 88 and it was the best purchase I have ever done for my series. My wife was overwhelmed by the cost until she drove the truck. Now she enjoys driving it around town.

Just a couple of thoughts

1. Check your swivel balls, any pitting get prepared to replace them.
2. Replace all of your tie rod ends -

--- It is amazing what new swivel balls and tie rod ends will do. If I were to do it over again, I would have done the P38 power steering conversion at the same time.

Check out this link:http://www.expeditionlandrover.info/PowerSteering.htm

3. Check your axle breathers while you are down there.
4. Make sure your booster is in good shape
5. Check the rest of your brake lines for wear and movement.
6. Get ready to paint or powder coat all the parts that need it.
7. Replace the Races at the same time.
8. Replace your front shocks while you are at it (if they are original)
9. Swivel grease not oil in your swivel balls.
10. Get all your tires balanced and aligned perfectly.

o2batsea
08-28-2012, 06:00 PM
Alternately you can use a hydroboost instead of the vacuum type. One will bolt up to a late s3 tower and plumb into a power steering pump. This will dramatically reduce the amount of body trimming, and give you a much lighter pedal.

o2batsea
08-28-2012, 07:31 PM
There is nothing magical about a Land Rover brake booster. It's a pretty standard set up and you could probably fit something from the local pick and pull quite easily that'll fit on a S3/Defender tower. The only consideration would be the line fittings on the MC if you get one from say a pickup truck. The Rover ones are 3/8ths-24 which is not America standard. Easy enuf to make new lines with the proper ends.

thixon
08-29-2012, 11:51 AM
There is nothing magical about a Land Rover brake booster. It's a pretty standard set up and you could probably fit something from the local pick and pull quite easily that'll fit on a S3/Defender tower. The only consideration would be the line fittings on the MC if you get one from say a pickup truck. The Rover ones are 3/8ths-24 which is not America standard. Easy enuf to make new lines with the proper ends.

Wouldn't you also have to be concerned with the bore and stroke of the master cyliner? If it can't move enough fluid to acuate the braking system, you'd be in for a wild ride!

I Leak Oil
08-29-2012, 05:26 PM
To add to what Travis said, Mounting bolt pattern (on both ends), diameter, thickness, will you have to modify the fender to fit it, connection to the pedal....by the time you're done you're better off just getting a rover booster or find an alternate that you KNOW fits a series with minimal modification.

o2batsea
08-29-2012, 06:54 PM
To add to what Travis said, Mounting bolt pattern (on both ends), diameter, thickness, will you have to modify the fender to fit it, connection to the pedal....by the time you're done you're better off just getting a rover booster or find an alternate that you KNOW fits a series with minimal modification.
They're all about the same. On both ends. Worst case you make a bolt plate out of 1/4 inch to adapt. But I know that a regular old Delphi MC is a straight up fit on an S3 tower, and if you add a hydroboost, the fender trimming is minimal. And I am pretty sure that your standard issue C-10 brake MC is well up to the chore, as well as anything similar. It's not like Rover used something that was not an off the shelf solution. Brake systems are more or less universal.

luckyjoe
08-30-2012, 08:35 AM
Another less invasive option is to install 109 front brakes.

Surplus to my needs, I have a complete front set of 109 twin leading shoe brakes.

A nice upgrade for an 88...

yorker
08-30-2012, 04:49 PM
Not sure how diaphragm diameter affects boost, as remote servo's are available in various boost ratios with the similar diaphragm diameter, or occasionally higher boost with smaller diaphragm (1.9:1 = 8", 2.3:1 = 6").

Maybe some have more than one diaphragm inside.

single:http://image.superchevy.com/f/13001396+w750+st0/sucp_0901_06_z+power_brake_boosters+single_diaphra gm_booster.jpg

Dual
http://image.superchevy.com/f/13001390/sucp_0901_03_z+power_brake_boosters+dual_diaphragm .jpg

Booster style Pedal PSI out Maximum Attainable

7” single diaphragm 120 800 800
7” dual diaphragm 120 900 1200
8” dual diaphragm 120 1000 1400
9” single diaphragm 120 900 1200
9' dual diaphragm 120 1200 1500


The efffect of booster size on pressure
output.
The effectiveness of your braking
will ultimately be determined by the
amount of hydraulic pressure being
pushed out to the wheels. The primary
factor is how much power assist your
booster will provide.
As a general rule the pressure
output of a booster is directly proportional
to it’s diameter, the bigger the booster
the more assist it will give. Other factors
will enter into the equation such as vacuum
level or booster design. Low vacuum
will diminish your boosters assist. anything
lower than 18” will begin to diminish
the performance of your booster so it’s
necessary that you have at least 18” of
vacuum from your engine. The smaller
the booster diameter the greater the negative
effect of low vacuum will have on
the booster. NEVER GO BELOW 16”!
Booster performance can be
enhanced by modifying the design. By
adding an additional internal diaphragm
you can generate additional assist giving
you the performance of a larger booster
in a smaller space.http://www.mpbrakes.com/uploads/documents/optomize.pdf

also:

The effect of master cylinder bore
size on pressure output.
By changing the bore size of
the master cylinder you can adjust the
amount of pressure output. The smaller
the bore of the master the more pressure
it puts out. The trade off is pedal travel.
too small a bore will stop you nicely but
you may be very uncomfortable with the
travel. The following data is with 20”
vacuum and a dual diaphragm 8”
booster.
So typically you can gain a 25%
increase in pressure output by dropping
to a 1” bore master from 1-1/8”

see also: http://www.classicperform.com/PDFs/BoosterBrakePressureChart.pdf


This is the formula to figure your output booster pressure.

Force in pounds = (Diaphragm area in square inches) x (manifold vacuum in inches Hg) x ½

Example: 7” single diaphragm booster with 17 inches of vacuum. 3.5” x 3.5” x 3.14 = 38.465 square inches x 17 inches of vacuum x 50% = 326.95 psi








Power Boosters: Power boosters were needed when disc brake systems were being used more and more on factory cars. The amount of boost created from the booster is directly related to the square inches of the booster and the inches of vacuum imputed from the engine. Since the disc brake calipers required a greater volume of fluid due to the size of the pistons and the clamping force (some times up to 6 tons), the master cylinder requires a bigger diameter bores to push the required volume of brake fluid. When you increase the bore size you reduce the output pressure of the master cylinder. In order to boost the pressure output of this larger bore master cylinder the factories installed a power booster. Power booster range in size from 7" to 11". Most street rods have floor mounted pedals so the master cylinders are generally located under the floor boards. This creates a room problem so the 7" booster was incorporated to use with the 1" and 1-1/8" master cylinders. The biggest problem with using a power booster is it requires vacuum to operate and most hot rods have 3/4 race cams so there is little or no vacuum. If you are currently using a power booster and having problems stopping, take a vacuum gauge and check the inches of vacuum. To work properly it takes 16-18 inches of vacuum anything much less than this forget it.

The dual diaphragm 7” has a total area of over 76 square inches about the same as a 10” single. This doubles the vacuum assist of the single diaphragm. I would recommend anyone using the older single diaphragm to update to this booster.
http://www.hotrodheaven.com/tech/brakes/

TeriAnn
08-31-2012, 09:35 AM
Nice bit of research very well presented.

Apis Mellifera
08-31-2012, 07:27 PM
I've been pondering disc brakes for a while. Does anyone have a spare front swivel housing etc? Basically everything from the swivel ball out. I have access to 3D scanning, rapid prototyping, 5-axis CNC, etc. It seems like most people could source common calipers and brackets and rotors, if off-the-shelf. What is not so easy, is sticking the pieces on stock parts. I'm not saying I can definitely do this easier and cheaper, but I have some ideas I'd like to flesh out.

Revtor
09-01-2012, 08:56 AM
You could maybe go here and pull a few.. Oh wait that's the Defender pile...

http://www.4x4dergi.com/hurda-arac-israfi/

ouch!
~Steve

jp-
09-01-2012, 10:44 AM
I am working on a Disc brake conversion, using off the shelf Mazda parts. You get to keep your Land Rover hubs, and it works with stock 16" wheels. Testing hopefully to be completed early next year.