parabolics

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ctrover
    Low Range
    • Aug 2007
    • 79

    parabolics

    Do they make any parabolics out there that dont raise your ride up?I need to replace just my rear springs but dont want the rover to looked "jacked up".I like my stock tires.
  • Terrys
    Overdrive
    • May 2007
    • 1382

    #2
    I wouldn't think it's a good idea to mix and match parabolics with conventional multi-leaf springs, especially parabolics in the rear and conventional in the front. You could have some unusual handling characteristics in a hard turn manuver at speed.

    Comment

    • yorker
      Overdrive
      • Nov 2006
      • 1635

      #3
      it will looked jacked up regardless with new springs on the rear and old ones on the front.
      1965 SIIa 88",1975 Ex-MOD 109/Ambulance, 1989 RRC, blah, blah, blah...

      Land Rover UK Forums

      Comment

      • PH4
        3rd Gear
        • Jan 2007
        • 375

        #4
        I just replaced the springs on my 1972 109 SW and I was concerned about the same thing but was pleasantly surprised that it really did not make a big difference. I did the two leaf front and the three leaf rear. I think it would make a big difference on a military chasis.

        Comment

        • badvibes
          3rd Gear
          • Mar 2007
          • 364

          #5
          Originally posted by ctrover
          Do they make any parabolics out there that dont raise your ride up?I need to replace just my rear springs but dont want the rover to looked "jacked up".I like my stock tires.
          CTROVER-

          If your curent suspension is wasted, mine was, 3 out of 4 springs with at least 1 broken leaf in it, a new suspension will probably sit a little higher. I went with a standard 88 set of springs. 9 leaf front 11 leaf rear if I remember correctly. But the new suspension didn't look "jacked up" at all. My tires are 235x85x16 and look fine. My suspension has @ 6000 miles on it now, My friend who also has a '64 2A put a set of parabolics on his truck this year. The height of the bodies between both trucks is within 1/2 inch of each other. We both thought the paras would sit a couple of inches higher than a standard suspension but it didn't. He also runs 235x85s. I don't know what brand springs he went with but I'll see if he can post up some information.

          Jeff

          My buddy says his parabolics are made by "Rocky Mountain." 2 leaf front, 3 leaf rear.
          Last edited by badvibes; 08-30-2007, 06:32 PM.
          1964 Series 2A SW, LHD mostly stock, often runs!

          1991 Range Rover Hunter

          Comment

          • scott
            Overdrive
            • Oct 2006
            • 1226

            #6
            the paras ride alot smoother in my opinion. no offense jeff
            '64 Series IIA 88 Canvas Tilt
            '68 Series IIA RHD Ambulance
            '76 Spitfire 1500
            '07 LR3 (Series Recovery Vehicle)

            Comment

            • badvibes
              3rd Gear
              • Mar 2007
              • 364

              #7
              Originally posted by scott
              the paras ride alot smoother in my opinion. no offense jeff
              None taken! I agree!

              Jeff
              1964 Series 2A SW, LHD mostly stock, often runs!

              1991 Range Rover Hunter

              Comment

              • luckyjoe
                3rd Gear
                • Oct 2006
                • 335

                #8
                Originally posted by PH4
                I think it would make a big difference on a military chasis.
                CTrover - is is a military chassis?

                Regards,
                Tom P.
                1965 exMoD 109
                1995 RRC LWB w/EAS

                Comment

                Working...