The mystery of the split galvanizing

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • lesfurieux
    Low Range
    • Mar 2008
    • 8

    The mystery of the split galvanizing

    Hello,
    I was wondering if anyone knew why the galvanized rail on the top of the truck bed on the Series Land Rovers is split. Should it be welded together? I've pointed to it in the picture with a red arrow. Thank you for your help.
  • TJR
    2nd Gear
    • Dec 2006
    • 279

    #2
    Mine too..? ('73 serIII) Seems like it is designed that way, the front portion is welded.
    Perhaps it was a way to control the length and account for body mfg variation







    ..Talbot
    Last edited by TJR; 06-04-2008, 11:40 PM.

    Comment

    • lesfurieux
      Low Range
      • Mar 2008
      • 8

      #3
      Exactly! Why is this so? You've got better pictures, by the way.

      Comment

      • LaneRover
        Overdrive
        • Oct 2006
        • 1743

        #4
        My guess is that the front is welded because that will be the same for 88's or 109's. For the rear of a 109 maybe they just put in a longer 'spacer'. I can't check my 109 p-up right now but what are the chances that there are 2 non welded joints on each side of a 109?

        Purely speculation on my part!

        Brent
        1958 107 SW - Sold to a better home
        1965 109 SW - nearly running well
        1966 88 SW - running but needing attention
        1969 109 P-UP

        http://www.facebook.com/album.php?ai...2&l=64cfe23aa2

        Comment

        • daveb
          5th Gear
          • Nov 2006
          • 513

          #5
          front portion is different on a 109 as the seat bulkhead to b-pillar relationship is different.



          Originally posted by LaneRover
          My guess is that the front is welded because that will be the same for 88's or 109's. For the rear of a 109 maybe they just put in a longer 'spacer'. I can't check my 109 p-up right now but what are the chances that there are 2 non welded joints on each side of a 109?

          Purely speculation on my part!

          Brent
          A Land Rover would never turn up to collect an Oscar. It'd be far too busy doing something important, somewhere, for someone."


          Comment

          • LaneRover
            Overdrive
            • Oct 2006
            • 1743

            #6
            Originally posted by daveb
            front portion is different on a 109 as the seat bulkhead to b-pillar relationship is different.
            Damn you and your logic!

            Then maybe the front needs more structure as the rear end ties into some vertical steel pieces and thus derives some strength from that.

            or maybe the guy that welds the back section died and they didn't want to replace him at the factory. . . .
            1958 107 SW - Sold to a better home
            1965 109 SW - nearly running well
            1966 88 SW - running but needing attention
            1969 109 P-UP

            http://www.facebook.com/album.php?ai...2&l=64cfe23aa2

            Comment

            • daveb
              5th Gear
              • Nov 2006
              • 513

              #7
              heh heh, pretty rare situation when logic and land rovers meet. I think I've seen where the rear corners are welded, perhaps on defenders.

              I would guess that it has to do with taking up production tolerances.





              Originally posted by LaneRover
              Damn you and your logic!

              Then maybe the front needs more structure as the rear end ties into some vertical steel pieces and thus derives some strength from that.

              or maybe the guy that welds the back section died and they didn't want to replace him at the factory. . . .
              A Land Rover would never turn up to collect an Oscar. It'd be far too busy doing something important, somewhere, for someone."


              Comment

              • 4flattires
                4th Gear
                • Aug 2007
                • 424

                #8
                One word.

                Thermal expansion.

                Ok ...it's two words. I was boored at the office today and had to poke fun at something.

                Jeff
                64 SIIa 109 all stock
                69 SIIa 88 all stock
                Old tractors
                New Harleys
                Old trucks

                Comment

                • I Leak Oil
                  Overdrive
                  • Nov 2006
                  • 1796

                  #9
                  It's probably just easier to make it out of 2 pieces than one big piece. And, of course, why weld them together? Doesn't really add anything to the structure. Who really knows though, maybe the factory welded some and not others for no apparent reason!
                  Jason T.
                  Jason
                  "Clubs are for Chumps" Club president

                  Comment

                  • pvkd
                    1st Gear
                    • Jan 2007
                    • 118

                    #10
                    mine is welded together!
                    1971 109 Safari Wagon (1 ton chassis)
                    1995 LWB Range Rover Classic
                    1997 Defender 90 (repaired at last)
                    2001 P38A Range Rover

                    Comment

                    • daveb
                      5th Gear
                      • Nov 2006
                      • 513

                      #11
                      on the 90 or the 5 door or both?

                      Originally posted by pvkd
                      mine is welded together!
                      A Land Rover would never turn up to collect an Oscar. It'd be far too busy doing something important, somewhere, for someone."


                      Comment

                      Working...