Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Disco I rear end ratios

  1. #1

    Default Disco I rear end ratios

    If I am correct, the Disco I comes with a 3.54 rear end. What other gear ratios can be fitted? I would like to fit a higher ratio - probably something around a 2.73 or so. Is that possible? If so, where can such gear sets be obtained?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Redmond, Wa.
    Posts
    52

    Default

    Why would you want to do that? I do not think it would move with that high of a ratio...3.54 is actually quite tall as it is. most Jeeps have 3.55 0r my 98 had 3.73 and the 4 cylinders all had 4.11 as well as the Rubicons...Most people look for lower gears not taller ones. I doubt taller gears even exist actually.
    2003 Disco SE7 expedition prepped
    1998 Disco LSE 7 50th anniversary Baluga Black
    1996 Disco XD Trek number 4 and Camel Selections
    1969 Series 2A 109

  3. #3

    Default

    Not to mention 2.73 is a lower ratio, not higher.
    It is higher gearing however.

    In any case, here are some alternative ratios that are available:
    http://www.ashcroft-transmissions.co...ewCat&catId=12
    Tom Rowe

    Four wheel drive allows you to get stuck
    in places even more inaccessible.

    62 88 reg
    67 NADA x2
    74 Air Portable - The Antichrist (tag 6A666)
    95 D1 - R380
    95 D90 - R380
    97 D1 - ZF

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    N. York
    Posts
    1,635

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 1996trek4 View Post
    Why would you want to do that? .
    Because you were running an alternative diesel engine with a lot more torque. In high range you are effectively running around with the equivalent of other vehicles with 4.3 R&Ps. 1.22 X 3.54= 4.31
    1965 SIIa 88",1975 Ex-MOD 109/Ambulance, 1989 RRC, blah, blah, blah...

    Land Rover UK Forums

  5. #5

    Default

    Basically, that's it. Apparently, there are a few, relatively rare, LT230 tc's with 1:1 high range gearing. My goal is to wind up with 2000 rpm = 70 mph using the highest gears. Virtually impossible without an overdrive somewhere in the system.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    N. York
    Posts
    1,635

    Default

    Yeah-It doesn't help that the LT230 more or less cancels out the OD ratio of any transmission hooked to it.
    1965 SIIa 88",1975 Ex-MOD 109/Ambulance, 1989 RRC, blah, blah, blah...

    Land Rover UK Forums

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    151

    Default

    Go talk to Ashcroft. Don't forget taller tires can be part of the gearing equation.

  8. #8

    Default

    I am looking at doing the same thing. If I can get a 3.08 set in both axles that would put my disco II at 2108 at 70mph. Anybody know if this would be something that would hard break the drive train for make it not driveable?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
About us
Unparalleled product knowledge. Our mission is to support all original Land Rover models no longer supported by your local Land Rover franchise. We offer the entire range of Land Rover Genuine Parts direct from Land Rover UK, as well as publish North America's largest Land Rover publication, Rovers Magazine.
Join us