Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11

Thread: LPG or Diesel?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Marlboro, NJ
    Posts
    24

    Default LPG or Diesel?

    Would appreciate your thoughts on this.

    What would be more desirable? A friend's 1984 110 has a 3.5L V8, but has an LPG conversion. The truck has only done 90k km (56k miles) from new. Should he replace the engine with a rebuilt, recon petrol engine, or, should he rip out the lpg and replace the current engine with a diesel, a 300 tdi? He'll put in a recon gearbox, appropriate to whichever engine he chooses thereafter.

    The vehicle will be sold at some point in the next few months following this?

    Personally, I would utilize the LPG and put in a powerful petrol engine, but he wants to know what the wider world thinks on this.
    1993 NAS 110 300tdi conversion
    1985 90 300 tdi (from Italy)
    1985 90 prototype
    1983 S3 88" Safari SW

  2. #2

    Default

    Diesel all the way. Much better economy, torque, an availability for fuel. How much is he selling it for? Just curious.

    I am currently doing a similar swap, with a Cummins 2.8l, and an Allison 1000 six speed tranny into a 2003 Disco.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Marlboro, NJ
    Posts
    24

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Shannon.cummins View Post
    Diesel all the way. Much better economy, torque, an availability for fuel. How much is he selling it for? Just curious.

    I am currently doing a similar swap, with a Cummins 2.8l, and an Allison 1000 six speed tranny into a 2003 Disco.
    I'll be really interested to know how that works out.....are you doing it yourself?

    You should drive the 110 with a V8......a friend put in a 3.9L (not a 3.5) V8 into his 110.....it can become very addictive, however, you are absolutely correct about the availability of fuel issue.

    My line of thinking was this.....
    I heard....now, I have no knowledge of this.......that the LPG conversion can easily be modified to allow the system to use CNG instead. CNG here is about $1 a gallon. There is not much difference between LPG and gasoline, at least the last time I checked, but with CNG costing less than half the cost of gasoline, I figure......not a bad idea!

    I came across something on a UK website about the relative cost of LPG, and it make's very interesting reading....now, in this example, for us at least, I would substitute CNG for LPG, as in the UK, LPG is a lot cheaper than gasoline.

    From autogas.co.uk:
    Off road large 4x4 car:
    Averaging 15 mpg over 30000 miles.
    Petrol price 1.19p per litre
    LPG price 0.63p per litre
    You lose twenty percent MPG due to the calorific difference of LPG against petrol so with this worked out you will save based on the above £3654.70, which is an equivalent mpg of 23mpg.

    1993 NAS 110 300tdi conversion
    1985 90 300 tdi (from Italy)
    1985 90 prototype
    1983 S3 88" Safari SW

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    N. York
    Posts
    1,635

    Default

    Have you ever driven a CNG vehicle?
    1965 SIIa 88",1975 Ex-MOD 109/Ambulance, 1989 RRC, blah, blah, blah...

    Land Rover UK Forums

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Albuquerque
    Posts
    1,226

    Default

    i worked for the bia years ago. they bought a fleet of cng trucks for the maintenance crews at the elementary schools out on the reservations and it wasn't 'til the recieved the trucks that they found they didn't have the range to make a round trip from albuquerque to a lot of the schools. albuquerque had the only fueling station.

    does lpg have a decent range? it's good for extreme angle running but so is efi and di
    '64 Series IIA 88 Canvas Tilt
    '68 Series IIA RHD Ambulance
    '76 Spitfire 1500
    '07 LR3 (Series Recovery Vehicle)

  6. #6

    Default http://www.roversnorth.com/forums/newreply.php?do=newreply&noquote=1&p=56426

    The most important factor is, what's he using it for?

    If he's off-roading, or doing long range driving, then go diesel. They don't mind getting wet, they give better consumption, better range, good torque, etc. And I'd choose a 200 Tdi over the 300. It's a more straight-forward engine, and slightly tougher in my opinion. The 300 has one or two little factors that can cause problems (heat sensor in the head that won't tell you if it's overheating because it's low on water, leaking P gasket, etc).

    If he's cruising about and sticking to tarmac, stay with the V8. They are more powerful, smoother, sound better, quicker to accelerate, etc. Plus you can pull out the 3.5 and stick the carbs on a 3.9 block, or even a 4.6.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Marlboro, NJ
    Posts
    24

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by yorker View Post
    Have you ever driven a CNG vehicle?
    Never, but I assumed it was the same......I am guessing that I am wrong to assume this?
    1993 NAS 110 300tdi conversion
    1985 90 300 tdi (from Italy)
    1985 90 prototype
    1983 S3 88" Safari SW

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Marlboro, NJ
    Posts
    24

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by scott View Post
    i worked for the bia years ago. they bought a fleet of cng trucks for the maintenance crews at the elementary schools out on the reservations and it wasn't 'til the recieved the trucks that they found they didn't have the range to make a round trip from albuquerque to a lot of the schools. albuquerque had the only fueling station.

    does lpg have a decent range? it's good for extreme angle running but so is efi and di
    I believe you can switch back and forth between LPG and gas, so, if you run out, you just flick the switch to allow gasoline, and there you go!

    I would assume that it's the same for CNG. Or is that completely incorrect?
    1993 NAS 110 300tdi conversion
    1985 90 300 tdi (from Italy)
    1985 90 prototype
    1983 S3 88" Safari SW

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Marlboro, NJ
    Posts
    24

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by spacemutt View Post
    The most important factor is, what's he using it for?

    If he's off-roading, or doing long range driving, then go diesel. They don't mind getting wet, they give better consumption, better range, good torque, etc. And I'd choose a 200 Tdi over the 300. It's a more straight-forward engine, and slightly tougher in my opinion. The 300 has one or two little factors that can cause problems (heat sensor in the head that won't tell you if it's overheating because it's low on water, leaking P gasket, etc).

    If he's cruising about and sticking to tarmac, stay with the V8. They are more powerful, smoother, sound better, quicker to accelerate, etc. Plus you can pull out the 3.5 and stick the carbs on a 3.9 block, or even a 4.6.
    I had posted the question before I left for Europe and he made his decision shortly after that. He decided upon a recon 300tdi, however, he had it rebuilt as a 2.8L. He's very pleased with it! I am looking forward to seeing it!
    1993 NAS 110 300tdi conversion
    1985 90 300 tdi (from Italy)
    1985 90 prototype
    1983 S3 88" Safari SW

  10. #10

    Default

    Did he have a stroker kit fitted? Why didn't he go for a new 2.8 TGV engine?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
About us
Unparalleled product knowledge. Our mission is to support all original Land Rover models no longer supported by your local Land Rover franchise. We offer the entire range of Land Rover Genuine Parts direct from Land Rover UK, as well as publish North America's largest Land Rover publication, Rovers Magazine.
Join us