Best Year for a Disco ?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • LH Drive
    2nd Gear
    • Oct 2006
    • 253

    Best Year for a Disco ?

    I would like to buy an older Disco and was wondering what is the best or better year and with what size engine/tranny?
    I know of a 1994 Disco with a 3.9 engine and 5-speed manual tranny thats for sale in my area. It's got right under 200,000 miles on the OD, is this good or bad?
    Last edited by LH Drive; 07-25-2007, 11:05 AM.
    1972 NAS Series 88 SW
  • Les Parker
    RN Sales Team - Super Moderator
    • May 2006
    • 2020

    #2
    Hello there,
    Is that maunal Discovery still for sale?
    I have a 97 4.0 Manual and it works out great for all the family (and dogs),
    being an ex- N.M. vehicle it has none of the New England rust rat syndrome, it is my preferred year as it has all the goodies that were absent on the 94/95's but without all the electronics of the DII's.
    Just my sixpenneth worth.....


    Les Parker
    Tech. Support and Parts Specialist
    Rovers North Inc.

    Comment

    • Buddy
      Low Range
      • Oct 2006
      • 36

      #3
      It really depends on what you're looking for and what your preference is. Since the best or better is an opinion and not a fact it also depends on who you ask.

      Some people like the 95 because they had worked out some of the early bugs but it is still pre ODB-II so in most states not required to have emissions testing. It's also a little simpler then the other ones. Others will tell you first half of 99 because it's the latest DI's made and hence the newest and most refined.

      I own a 97 and I'm perfectly happy with it.

      Comment

      • dcwhybrew
        Low Range
        • Nov 2006
        • 54

        #4
        Of the 4 Rovers we have owned, we have had the least problems with our DIIs, and particularly our 02 DII has been near perfect (I hope I haven't ginxed myself).

        Comment

        • landrover77
          Low Range
          • Mar 2007
          • 62

          #5
          old disco freak

          The older discovery models are exeptional vehicles on road
          and off road, -of course. Unless it was maint.
          perfectly for its life I would advise you search for a Rover
          at most with 80,000 -90,000 mi. -get a full (very thorough)
          history of maint. / try it out first (of course)
          look underneath and see if oil is caked on -Bad sign.
          I've got a 1995 Discovery and I feel it has the best of both worlds
          that being: off road savy and rugged w/ comfort and style, equal balance.
          I feel the later model Discovery has too much comfort & "luxury" emphasis
          and not enough Rugged or off road savy. Ex: 89 thru 95 Disco is easy to work
          on in the driveway or on the trail vrs. later Discovery/LR3
          Note: that Discovery II has a bigger engine, I think its a 4.6 L
          Its personal and depends on what you are looking to put the Rover through.
          Look under the hood- clean? hoses good?
          make sure no other leaks (ie: power steering/engine coolant)
          After you've decided it meets your standard -take to a shop.

          They are awesome vehicles and a fun ride - but check it out
          really good first - parts are not cheap, and this may be the only time I'd
          every tell anybody else to go to the LR Dealer -for a diagnostic inspection.
          only because they get paid per job (not per hour) so they should do
          (in their best interest) a thorough inspection. No one says they have to do the
          work right? Only buy parts from someone like ROVERS NORTH or ATLANTIC BRITISH -some genuine parts
          are better than other non-genuine parts though.

          I wish you luck and hope to see another Discovery I out there on the
          road /trail. -cheers
          Last edited by landrover77; 09-02-2007, 12:35 PM.

          Comment

          • xrover
            Low Range
            • May 2007
            • 95

            #6
            96 and 97 have done well by me. I have looked at older and newer and found the best value and service from these years. LOL
            Tim M.
            Ashburnham, MA

            Comment

            Working...