custom rear bumpers?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • LaneRover
    Overdrive
    • Oct 2006
    • 1743

    #16
    Oh, I am sure that you could use bolts - in some fashion to get the same strength.. Just as with enough dental floss you could tie something on with the same strength.

    I am not saying that you shouldn't make an awesome rear crossmember/bumper. I think that it would be neat if you did. But know what you are getting yourself into. I also think that just bolting it on is a bad idea. Bolts may offer the same or greater strength - at the moment.

    If you find out that the Pangolin bumper in the picture is:
    (1) bolted on in place of the RCM
    (2) no other piece is welded in to strengthen the chassis
    (3) It is not bolted to or around the original RCM that is still in place

    Then I would be happy to pay you $100.00. I offered up the bet and if you want to take it then please go ahead, I won't welch.

    Brent
    1958 107 SW - Sold to a better home
    1965 109 SW - nearly running well
    1966 88 SW - running but needing attention
    1969 109 P-UP

    http://www.facebook.com/album.php?ai...2&l=64cfe23aa2

    Comment

    • alaskajosh
      2nd Gear
      • Sep 2007
      • 208

      #17
      haha.. you're a good guy Brent. I'm not much of a betting person. In this case it's just fun to think/talk about. I'll give 'em a call, though, and ask how they did it, what they ran into, etc.

      I don't care either way on fastening.. If I can manage to weld a cool bumper I imagine I could weld it to the frame too. Hell, it would probably be easier. I was just thinking of convenience of future modifications, repairs, modularity, whatever.

      I appreciate your thoughts!

      Comment

      • LaneRover
        Overdrive
        • Oct 2006
        • 1743

        #18
        No worries, I am usually not a betting man either but since I was the one who put it out there...

        It can be very fascinating figuring out how things are done - or figuring out why some company didn't do it the right way! A friend of mine is doing up a special Land-Rover badge for me and he called me because he wanted to explain how they stamped the badges because it was a process that he had heard of but never actually seen. If you look at the aluminum badge on a series Rover the "Land-Rover" is stamped out but is not crisp, the letters are a bit rounded. If you turn it over the indentations on the back are very crisp and distinct. Basically he said that they only used a one sided die and stamped the pieces into rubber. It would make sense as Rover thought of this as a 'stop-gap' product at first and they wanted to spend as little as possible in tooling.

        Definitely let us know what you decide to do in regards with beefing up your RCM. We definitely like to see what everyone is doing.

        We could even have a new section and call it:

        "One person's overkill is another person's just enough"

        Brent
        1958 107 SW - Sold to a better home
        1965 109 SW - nearly running well
        1966 88 SW - running but needing attention
        1969 109 P-UP

        http://www.facebook.com/album.php?ai...2&l=64cfe23aa2

        Comment

        • jp-
          5th Gear
          • Oct 2006
          • 981

          #19
          Originally posted by LaneRover

          We could even have a new section and call it:

          "One person's overkill is another person's just enough"

          Brent

          I like that!

          But seriously, Alaska, the RCM really isn't the weakest part of the frame, to me it's the front frame horns.

          If you're that concerned about it, maybe you should just have a new frame made up out of 3/16" or 1/4" steel instead of the standard 1/8". It has been done. Guy in Hawaii?? I think.

          Then you'd have no need for a stronger RCM. It wouldn't give no matter what.
          61 II 109" Pickup (Restomod, 350 small block, TR4050)
          66 IIA 88" Station Wagon (sold)
          66 IIA 109" Pickup (Restomod, 5MGE, R380)
          67 IIA 109" NADA Wagon (sold)
          88, 2.5TD 110 RHD non-hicap pickup

          -I used to know everything there was to know about Land Rovers; then I joined the RN Bulletin Board.

          Comment

          • Donnie
            2nd Gear
            • Apr 2007
            • 287

            #20
            If you R seeking protection in case that U get rear-ended because UR vehicle is slow. Or you may be thinking about pulling someone with a Rope/chain : engineering data suggests bolting to the frame, not welding. RE, the bolts will sheer off if an impact should occur, rather than causeing extensive damage to the frame which if welded is now an integral part of the structure..Grade 2 bolts are softest and will provide a fair amt of sheer resistance, although not rec. for auto. use..5 is stronger, and grade 8 is tough, may as well weld if using grade 8..just my 2 cents worth....Donnie
            I spent most of my money on women & cars, the rest of it I just wasted.......

            Comment

            • jp-
              5th Gear
              • Oct 2006
              • 981

              #21
              Originally posted by Donnie
              ...which if welded is now an integral part of the structure...
              Integral is good. I like integral.

              It makes me sleep better at night.
              61 II 109" Pickup (Restomod, 350 small block, TR4050)
              66 IIA 88" Station Wagon (sold)
              66 IIA 109" Pickup (Restomod, 5MGE, R380)
              67 IIA 109" NADA Wagon (sold)
              88, 2.5TD 110 RHD non-hicap pickup

              -I used to know everything there was to know about Land Rovers; then I joined the RN Bulletin Board.

              Comment

              Working...