Interesting Spin on a Series Rover
Collapse
X
-
It's already hard enough to see over the tire on the hood, geez.61 II 109" Pickup (Restomod, 350 small block, TR4050)
66 IIA 88" Station Wagon (sold)
66 IIA 109" Pickup (Restomod, 5MGE, R380)
67 IIA 109" NADA Wagon (sold)
88, 2.5TD 110 RHD non-hicap pickup
-I used to know everything there was to know about Land Rovers; then I joined the RN Bulletin Board. -
I do like the sand color, and that's what I'm going to paint the 109" pickup.61 II 109" Pickup (Restomod, 350 small block, TR4050)
66 IIA 88" Station Wagon (sold)
66 IIA 109" Pickup (Restomod, 5MGE, R380)
67 IIA 109" NADA Wagon (sold)
88, 2.5TD 110 RHD non-hicap pickup
-I used to know everything there was to know about Land Rovers; then I joined the RN Bulletin Board.Comment
-
A 12 cylinder option? Hmmm...This might just be the first Series Rover to break the "70-mile-per-hour barrier." I personally don't think its possible, since everyone knows that parts begin falling off at about 72 miler per hour.--Mark
1973 SIII 109 RHD 2.5NA Diesel
0-54mph in just under 11.5 minutes
(9.7 minutes now that she's a 3-door).Comment
-
-
Hey Ike,
I'm not sure I want to push her that hard but I am interested to know what gearing you are using on your higher powered machines. I'm building a NADA 109. My current plans for the drivetrain are a Chevy 292 breathed upon to give about 200hp, Ford NP435, high ratio transfer case plus 3.54s. That will give me good rpms for on the road I think and that granny low in the Ford will get me well down there for off road. The other option would be to go 4.11s. Being a lwb SW I'm thinking of her more as a family expedition truck and not as a rock crawler.
The 292 has peak torque a bit less than 2000rpm and I currently have 235/85R16s on. Any comments?
Cheers
GregorComment
-
If I had too much cash I would probably buy one!
I think that it looks pretty cool and is similar to what I have wanted to do. For some reason I have it in my head to build a 4 wheel drive 30's Bentley replica. Similar to what a guy did with an old Range Rover but I think that it would look better leafsprung. Will I ever do it? Who knows. But I would love to be cruising down the road and then just head off into a field - on purpose..
Brent1958 107 SW - Sold to a better home
1965 109 SW - nearly running well
1966 88 SW - running but needing attention
1969 109 P-UP
http://www.facebook.com/album.php?ai...2&l=64cfe23aa2Comment
-
I'm not sure I want to push her that hard but I am interested to know what gearing you are using on your higher powered machines.
But I would love to be cruising down the road and then just head off into a field - on purpose..
Cant you already do that . . . .Comment
-
Originally posted by leafsprung
Cant you already do that . . . .
Let me re-phrase that. I would love to be able to be cruising quite quickly down a road and just head off into a field at speed.1958 107 SW - Sold to a better home
1965 109 SW - nearly running well
1966 88 SW - running but needing attention
1969 109 P-UP
http://www.facebook.com/album.php?ai...2&l=64cfe23aa2Comment
-
-
Originally posted by LaneRoverLet me re-phrase that. I would love to be able to be cruising quite quickly down a road and just head off into a field at speed.
A 2 lane road, mountain on one side, large field on the other. Enough of a hill that full floored I was doing about 50 MPH (SIII 2.25L engine). An 18 wheeler came up from behind doing 15-20 MPH faster than I & passed. Unfortunately there was a second 18 wheeler right behind the first also passing AND an on coming 18 wheeler.
There was enough room for the first 18 wheeler to pass but not the second. The driver of the second 18 wheeler didn't like the idea of a head on at a combines speed of over 120 MPH so decided better me than him and started moving into my lane with me along side. I in turn decided that it would be a good time to do a little off road travel and chose to drive off into the field at 50 MPH rather than be a participant in an accident.
To this day I'm still very grateful that there was no drainage ditch.
That was the last of many close calls caused by faster impatient travelers before I made the decision to swap to a more powerful engine. When I got home I started looking for engines that might work in a Land Rover engine bay.
By the way, when you run your numbers, high range on an Ashcroft transfercase is 0.87:1
NP435 - Ashcroft - 3.54 R&P = 3.08:1 at the axle
With your 32 inch dia tyres that's 2100 RPM @ 65 MPH
Unless you have diesel like torque the gearing may be a little high and you low range would be too high for much off road work.
A close ratio NP435 + high ratio kit + 4.7:1 R&P + 35 inch tyres might work better for you, esp. if you ever plan to go off road.
I'm running a T18 + high ratio kit + 4.7:1 & 33.3" dia tyres (255/85R16)
which gives me 2,700 RPM @ 65 MPH. That's about 200 RPM higher than I would prefer but the 4.1 R&P would put me about 200 RPM lower than my prefered 65 MPH RPM and make second gear a little too tall to start off in (I have a granny first). 35 inch tyres would put me at what I believe to be my optimum 65 MPH cruise RPM, but 33.3 is as tall as I can go and easily enter my land rover in a narrow skirt and flats.
If you have the power to push it I think that tallest you might consider is a NP435 + high ratio + 4.1 R&P. And don't consider this combo with the granny first version
I think the granny gear version is only really useful for either gonzo rock crawling or bragging with mall terrain vehicle owners around a pitcher of beer.
I have gear rations on a web page
Play with the numbers.-
Teriann Wakeman_________
Flagstaff, AZ.
1960 Land Rover Dormobile, owned since 1978
My Land Rover web site
Comment
-
Originally posted by leafsprungyou can do that without making it look all goofy
If done right it wouldn't look goofy - of course if I do it that means it might end up looking goofy.....1958 107 SW - Sold to a better home
1965 109 SW - nearly running well
1966 88 SW - running but needing attention
1969 109 P-UP
http://www.facebook.com/album.php?ai...2&l=64cfe23aa2Comment
-
I think the granny gear version is only really useful for either gonzo rock crawling or bragging with mall terrain vehicle owners around a pitcher of beer.
Considering the relatively high low ratio in the rover transfer case I dont agree. Low ratios give fine control on technical terrain, (even relatively tame stuff) Which is very nice. Even with 4.7 gears and the ford NP435 you only have 74:1 with the c suff on t-case. Which is a nice low range, but for really fine control or rock crawling, double that would be ideal. For comparision the popular "Marlin ultimate crawler" for toyotas gives a 2.28:1 plus a 4.70 in the transfer cases. With other wise stock gearing that gives a 149:1 low-low. The lower the ratio the finer the control. There is a point at which additional lower gearing is no longer useful, but that point is far lower than 73:1.
wait a minute... .. does this mean we just started one of the keep it original/do what you want its yours stream hi-jacks?Comment
-
since everyone knows that parts begin falling off at about 72 miler per hour
for me it is windshield wipers.
first time it happened was with my D90 in a, naturally, thunder storm.
have lost 3 in the 109.
with gas the way it is now though, highway trips are more 55 than 70mph.
it was comical though to see folk's faces when a 109 with antique plates passed them at around 75mph - especially the Prius owners.
JaimeOne Life Live ItComment
-
Originally posted by TeriAnn
NP435 - Ashcroft - 3.54 R&P = 3.08:1 at the axle
With your 32 inch dia tyres that's 2100 RPM @ 65 MPH
Unless you have diesel like torque the gearing may be a little high and you low range would be too high for much off road work.
Originally posted by TeriAnnA close ratio NP435 + high ratio kit + 4.7:1 R&P + 35 inch tyres might work better for you, esp. if you ever plan to go off road.
Originally posted by TeriAnnIf you have the power to push it I think that tallest you might consider is a NP435 + high ratio + 4.1 R&P. And don't consider this combo with the granny first version
Thanks for the input everyone.
Cheers
GregorComment
Comment