Airportable register

[Les Parker]

Hey there folks !

Anyone else interested in a seperate register for Airportable IIa's and Series III's ?

[Rineheitzgabot]

[east high]

I'm guessing your asking about like what has been done for bug-eyes and 109 nada registry, right?

[Les Parker]

Airportables Unite !

Yes, indeed, a pic. of one under a helicopter in mid-air, or something of the ilk?
We seem to be getting a lot more enquiries for parts/info on these vehicles of late, so this appears to be a logical step forward....

[Tim Smith]

I'm in!
Here is a pic of mine. Not exactly being tossed from a chopper but still holding it's own.

[xsbowes]

Count me in!

[LaneRover]

I'm in!
Here is a pic of mine. Not exactly being tossed from a chopper but still holding it's own.

Would hold its own off-road as well as being the cooler vehicle to arrive in!

[Tim Smith]

Would hold its own off-road as well as being the cooler vehicle to arrive in!

And probably a safer ride too!

[xsbowes]

Can we revisit this? But call it The Half-Ton Rover registry.
I've seen a few new owners logging into the forum.

[Eric W S]

Can we revisit this? But call it The Half-Ton Rover registry.
I've seen a few new owners logging into the forum.

Then how would you differentiate non the non-military rovers?

[xsbowes]

That would depend on if Les is specifically talking about the 1/2 ton (aka lightweight or Rover 1) when he uses the term Airportable. If he is then there weren't any non-military versions. The regular 88s were refered to as 1/4 ton (or Rover 8(early IIA) and Rover 10(late IIA).

[telwyn]

I'd love to see it!