Hydrogen as a fuel

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Mike61
    Low Range
    • Oct 2008
    • 1

    Hydrogen as a fuel

    Have a 1972 Series III with 2.1/4 gas engine and zinith carb. Has anyone converted this engine to run on Hydrogen using one of the Hydrogen generators now on the market?
  • greenmeanie
    Overdrive
    • Oct 2006
    • 1358

    #2
    Originally posted by Mike61
    Have a 1972 Series III with 2.1/4 gas engine and zinith carb. Has anyone converted this engine to run on Hydrogen using one of the Hydrogen generators now on the market?
    As they are hokus pokus and witchcraft the answer is no. Do a little research and you'll find the only number that is improved is the seller's bank account.

    I found this system to do a much better job:


    From the EPA:

    Comment

    • thixon
      5th Gear
      • Jul 2007
      • 909

      #3
      Originally posted by greenmeanie
      As they are hokus pokus and witchcraft the answer is no. Do a little research and you'll find the only number that is improved is the seller's bank account.

      I found this system to do a much better job:


      From the EPA:
      http://www.hotrodders.com/forum/mira...es-145545.html
      Sarcasm...I love it!
      Travis
      '66 IIa 88

      Comment

      • SafeAirOne
        Overdrive
        • Apr 2008
        • 3435

        #4
        I dunno about hydrogen generators...I think that's still an emerging technology that hasn't been efficiently successful yet. I suppose hokus pokus and witchcraft are good terms to describe devices CURRENTLY available to consumers.

        When fuel prices (taxes) went crazy back in the UK some years ago, there was a huge shift to diesel engines AND LP gas conversion/augmentation systems. There are dozens of these tried and true LP gas systems available in the UK. Just head to Barnes & Noble and pick up any Land Rover magazine from the UK (Land Rover Monthly, Land Rover World, etc., if you can stomach the now $10 cost of the mags), and you'll see plenty of ads for these systems. I don't know about one for a 2.25 engine, though. Most of 'em are for the modern rover engines.

        Here are a few expamples:



        --Mark

        1973 SIII 109 RHD 2.5NA Diesel

        0-54mph in just under 11.5 minutes
        (9.7 minutes now that she's a 3-door).

        Comment

        • Leslie
          5th Gear
          • Oct 2006
          • 613

          #5
          -L

          '72 SIII SW 88"
          '60 SII 88" RHD

          Comment

          • lrdukdog
            3rd Gear
            • Nov 2006
            • 321

            #6
            fuels- natural gas

            It would be nice to have a doable natural gas type conversion. I am sure that my 109 SW wouls have room for the tanks required. In fact lets call our gov't reps and demand that they use OUR MONEY to initiate the retrofitting of gas stations with another pump. 1- for gasoline, 1- for diesel, 1- for natural gas.
            Jim Wolf
            Elvenwood Kennel

            Comment

            • Leslie
              5th Gear
              • Oct 2006
              • 613

              #7
              Uh...... doesn't WV and PA already have a lot of LPG stations around?

              We've just gotten some E85 stations here, but I'm not gonna start using the stuff unless they get cellulostic versions up and running, that are price-competitive w/o having subsidies involved.... (my pickup is flexfuel....)
              -L

              '72 SIII SW 88"
              '60 SII 88" RHD

              Comment

              • lrdukdog
                3rd Gear
                • Nov 2006
                • 321

                #8
                LPG

                I mean the whole country. I am in VA and while I am sure there are LPG places there aren't many or enought to make it a fuel the is convenient to use. All the natural gas co. vehicles are using it as fuel.
                Jim Wolf
                Elvenwood kennel

                Comment

                • LaneRover
                  Overdrive
                  • Oct 2006
                  • 1743

                  #9
                  In response to the Led Zeppelin cover featuring the Hindenburg, hydrogen is probably less explosive then gasoline. In fact it tends to just float away harmlessly in an accident. I think that Mythbusters proved that is was possible that part of the Hindenburg fire was a 'thermite' reaction.

                  Brent
                  1958 107 SW - Sold to a better home
                  1965 109 SW - nearly running well
                  1966 88 SW - running but needing attention
                  1969 109 P-UP

                  http://www.facebook.com/album.php?ai...2&l=64cfe23aa2

                  Comment

                  • thixon
                    5th Gear
                    • Jul 2007
                    • 909

                    #10
                    Originally posted by LaneRover
                    In response to the Led Zeppelin cover featuring the Hindenburg, hydrogen is probably less explosive then gasoline. In fact it tends to just float away harmlessly in an accident. I think that Mythbusters proved that is was possible that part of the Hindenburg fire was a 'thermite' reaction.

                    Brent
                    Actually,
                    They concluded that a thermite reaction was not the cause of the hindenburg distaster. While the thermite skin did burn, the model containing hydrogen burned twice as fast as the model without hydrogen.

                    The myth was listed as "busted," but in this case, the myth in question was that a thermite reaction was actually the cause of the dramatic fire caught on film.

                    Yes, I'm a dork.
                    Travis
                    '66 IIa 88

                    Comment

                    Working...