Series IIa or Series III?
Collapse
X
-
-
Teriann Wakeman_________
Flagstaff, AZ.
1960 Land Rover Dormobile, owned since 1978
My Land Rover web site
-
Jeff1964 Series 2A SW, LHD mostly stock, often runs!
1991 Range Rover HunterComment
-
He seems to be rebuilding his 1973 truck into a 1959 through 1973 truck. But it already had a mid 1960's 7:1 engine & IIA gearbox in it when he got it.
To answer your other question it has SII radiator bulkhead and front wings, so no quad headlamps.
And no I don't now why he is doing this other than it pleases him to do so and rewiring his truck for him gives me a little something to occupy my spare time with.-
Teriann Wakeman_________
Flagstaff, AZ.
1960 Land Rover Dormobile, owned since 1978
My Land Rover web site
Comment
-
I personally vouch for the IIA, just because there are less of them on the road. Oh, and No series 3 owner should be complaining about how expensive parts are.. Try Rebuilding a Series 1!1956 86" S1
1957 88" S1
1967 109" SIIA NADA
2007 LR3Comment
-
--Mark
1973 SIII 109 RHD 2.5NA Diesel
0-54mph in just under 11.5 minutes
(9.7 minutes now that she's a 3-door).Comment
-
Thanks for all the polling, there seems to be little doubt folks here prefer the IIa's over the III's. Vote if you haven't.=)1982 SIII 109 RHD petrol project.Comment
-
Well, it appears the forum has spoken. Focus on rebuilding the IIa I likely will do. There is something about the IIa look that screams classic rover isn't there.
Out of the multitude of viewers I particularly what to thank those of you who took the time to vote. Thank you. This is a great place.1982 SIII 109 RHD petrol project.Comment
Comment