Buying Rebuilt Engine Sources

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • SGS714
    Low Range
    • Jan 2007
    • 83

    #31
    Placed order for new engine today with ACR. Roland is the owner and very helpful.....should have right before xmas if all goes well.

    177 FtLb @ 2300 RPM 117 BHP @ 4100 RPM.

    ACR 2.8 Power Plus engine package, includes stage 2 head, Power Plus
    Cam and Power Plus carb and intake etc, with all bits to convert from 3MB
    Tubular 4:1 exhaust manifold
    Thermostat housing + thermost + water*pump
    Side plates, oil filler tube, engine mount brackets, engine mounts*etc, all prepared, painted and fitted with new fasteners.
    Air freight
    $7100

    Will keep you posted after I receive.
    ________________________
    67 Series II
    71 Series IIa 88" ACR 2.8 Power Plus
    89 RRC SWB 2-Door 2.4L tdi Spanish
    93 D110 NAS 327
    94 2x D90 NAS #'s 1076, 1181
    95 3x RRC 2-SWB, 1-LWB

    Comment

    • Mountain132
      Low Range
      • Apr 2008
      • 79

      #32
      That's great, the perfect xmas gift. Can't wait to see picks. I honestly hope it gets lost in shipping and ends up in my garage.

      The worst part now is just looking in your driveway everyday you come home from work hoping it's there, or do you have to pick it up which would ruin the surprise

      Comment

      • gchinsr
        Low Range
        • May 2010
        • 32

        #33
        I have wanted one of those forever, but too rich for my blood new. There is a GOD, as I just bought a EBay low mile used 2.8 5MB going to Roland for a freshening/check up before sailing after holidays. Huge upgrade from opening up everything inside the engine to breath better.

        Comment

        • junkyddog11
          1st Gear
          • Feb 2007
          • 195

          #34
          I have never understood the idea of a performance Series 4cyl but that doesn't mean it's a bad thing. ACR does a great job. I just don't particularily like the way they drive. The power is there but it is at a different rpm range. Reminds me of a 2 stroke motorcycle...."peaky".

          RN has been looking for cores to rebuild (or they have asked me several times but....I keep them for my own rebuilds), which would suggest to me that they are rebuilding them locally.
          Matt Browne
          www.overlandengineering.com
          "resurecting junk through engineering"

          Comment

          • Eric W S
            5th Gear
            • Dec 2006
            • 609

            #35
            Originally posted by junkyddog11
            I have never understood the idea of a performance Series 4cyl but that doesn't mean it's a bad thing. ACR does a great job. I just don't particularily like the way they drive. The power is there but it is at a different rpm range. Reminds me of a 2 stroke motorcycle...."peaky".

            RN has been looking for cores to rebuild (or they have asked me several times but....I keep them for my own rebuilds), which would suggest to me that they are rebuilding them locally.
            x2. A nice rebuild from a local shop and the 2.25 does nicely. The 2,2,5 is what it is.

            $7,100 for that motor is a complete rip -off.

            Comment

            • rejeep
              4th Gear
              • Apr 2010
              • 420

              #36
              Originally posted by SGS714
              177 FtLb @ 2300 RPM 117 BHP @ 4100 RPM.
              isnt that in the series gearbox unhappy area?
              1971 SIIa 88" NAS Dauntles V6
              1974 SIII 109" RHD

              Comment

              • KevinNY
                4th Gear
                • Oct 2006
                • 484

                #37
                That will be fine, look at the RPMs to be at those numbers.
                The Goat, 2.8 Daihatsu Td, '73 coil conversion

                Comment

                • I Leak Oil
                  Overdrive
                  • Nov 2006
                  • 1796

                  #38
                  Originally posted by KevinNY
                  That will be fine, look at the RPMs to be at those numbers.
                  Ya, your ear drums and fillings will cry uncle long before your gearbox does at that RPM.
                  As for the cost, I could care less what someone else spends their money on.....as long as their not spending mine!
                  Jason
                  "Clubs are for Chumps" Club president

                  Comment

                  • JackIIA
                    5th Gear
                    • Dec 2008
                    • 498

                    #39
                    A bit of a tangent, but if someone is kind enough to list the specs on an expensive item and include the cost, I for one really appreciate it. Not only does it provide a benchmark, but it increases bargaining power for anyone in the future who might take that route. If I know customer A paid X, I know not to pay more than that and if there is enough data, I may pay considerably less. Just a thought to avoid shutting down communication.

                    Getting off the soapbox now.
                    1970 88 IIA

                    Comment

                    • gchinsr
                      Low Range
                      • May 2010
                      • 32

                      #40
                      What many forget at looking at these numbers is, that is peak power and torque. What you forget is with new cam profile, and improved breathing, is the torque curve starts much lower with more available torque through to peak. Plus nothing beats extra displacement for power and torque improvements. IMHO

                      Comment

                      • gchinsr
                        Low Range
                        • May 2010
                        • 32

                        #41
                        What many forget at looking at these numbers is, that is peak power and torque. What you forget is with new cam profile, and improved breathing, is the torque curve starts much lower with more available torque through to peak. Plus nothing beats extra displacement for power and torque improvements. IMHO

                        Comment

                        • gchinsr
                          Low Range
                          • May 2010
                          • 32

                          #42
                          sorry all to double tap
                          Cheers
                          Greg

                          Comment

                          • mongoswede
                            5th Gear
                            • May 2010
                            • 757

                            #43
                            Ill admit that when I read you were paying $7k for an a built gas engine I nearly coughed up a lung. The performance numbers on it look good and if the build and finish quality are all top notch then its a little easier to understand....add to that any warranty and the turn key appeal and that's another plus. I go around in endless circles when thinking about rover engine swaps. There is a certain appeal to the stock rover engine for its simplicity. There is appeal to a rover v8 for the sound and grunt...then there are all the v6, v8, turbo 4, and diesel possibilities. If I ever ever build my 3 door 109 I am leaning towards a merc 300td engine.

                            Good luck with the acr unit and be sure to post pics, performance reviews etc. When it all comes together.

                            Comment

                            • gchinsr
                              Low Range
                              • May 2010
                              • 32

                              #44
                              I was lucky to find a low mileage used on on Ebay UK, it's at ACR as we speak, and is having the head removed to check internal condition. All the ancillaries,are being replaced, and replacing the points with an electronic unit. I was just about to swap a TDi, when I found this engine. Thing is, any body with basic skills, or any garage can fix this motor, it doesn't get much simpler, other than No points, which can be swapped out. Another benefit that is overlooked as well, is extra breathing capacity of the motor does wonder at higher altitudes as well, with a simple jet change for nose bleed heights. You have near V8 power, at a fraction of fuel usage, and a heck of a lot less weight. With the constuction of the Hi roof adding only about 20k, with low COG, Light weight interior, and super efficient lighter engine, this is the best combination for an expedition type camper I could come up with. There is no one size fits all, this is what I think is the best of available components for my son, and my trip to South America, at about 40% the cost of new.

                              Comment

                              • KevinNY
                                4th Gear
                                • Oct 2006
                                • 484

                                #45
                                Actually a Rover V8 weighs a good bit less than the 2.25 unit. Your gas mileage won't be much different either, my ACR 2.25 got about 11-12MPG.
                                The Goat, 2.8 Daihatsu Td, '73 coil conversion

                                Comment

                                Working...