Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: 200/300 Tdi owners - LT77 versus R380

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    340

    Default 200/300 Tdi owners - LT77 versus R380

    The other day someone asked me which is a better manual box for a 200/300 TDI. I thought about it and realized I had no idea if one is better than the other.

    Any thoughts? Terry?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Bloomfield, CT
    Posts
    1,382

    Default

    Given a choice, I'd always go with an R380 over an LT77. The 77 has weak inerds and that's why they replaced them all in the NAS110 with R380. They can last forever, but need to be shifted with a very light hand. You can't slam them like a Muncy.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Washington DC
    Posts
    513

    Default

    300tdi was only sold with the r380 behind it. have driven a few with this setup and I like it. Depending on what you are putting it in there can be fit issues with one or the other. The 300tdi version of the r380 is a good bit longer than a 4 cylinder lt77.

    Quote Originally Posted by VTRover View Post
    The other day someone asked me which is a better manual box for a 200/300 TDI. I thought about it and realized I had no idea if one is better than the other.

    Any thoughts? Terry?
    A Land Rover would never turn up to collect an Oscar. It'd be far too busy doing something important, somewhere, for someone."



  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Concord, Va
    Posts
    111

    Default

    Have had many of both. Currently have two 300 tdi's with r380's. I think the 4cyl lt77s shifts smoother. The lt77 was not a good match to the v8's. The r390 synchros leave a bit to be desired.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    1 hour North of Rovers North
    Posts
    144

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by daveb View Post
    300tdi was only sold with the r380 behind it. have driven a few with this setup and I like it. Depending on what you are putting it in there can be fit issues with one or the other. The 300tdi version of the r380 is a good bit longer than a 4 cylinder lt77.
    Problem with the r380 length is the bellhousing and input shaft length. I have an LT77 behind my 2.5 NA and plan on keeping it when I go 300tdi this summer.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Washington DC
    Posts
    513

    Default

    you can do that if you wish, but it is much better to get the proper r380. This places the engine further forward where it belongs, so that the radiator/intercooler/oil cooler etc hoses and exhaust all fit properly. You can install the r380 on the lt77 mounts too but it does create some problems. not to mention that the early lt77's used behind the 2.25 and 2.5 engines are not as robust as the later lt77 and r380 units. synchro reverse is nice to have too!



    Quote Originally Posted by RoverDover View Post
    Problem with the r380 length is the bellhousing and input shaft length. I have an LT77 behind my 2.5 NA and plan on keeping it when I go 300tdi this summer.
    A Land Rover would never turn up to collect an Oscar. It'd be far too busy doing something important, somewhere, for someone."



Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
About us
Unparalleled product knowledge. Our mission is to support all original Land Rover models no longer supported by your local Land Rover franchise. We offer the entire range of Land Rover Genuine Parts direct from Land Rover UK, as well as publish North America's largest Land Rover publication, Rovers Magazine.
Join us