head and tail light brush gaurds needed. bad gas mpg

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • montanarover
    Low Range
    • Dec 2011
    • 9

    head and tail light brush gaurds needed. bad gas mpg

    does any one know were i could find a used pair of the headlight / tail brush gaurds for a series 3.. also what mpg should i be getting out of my rover ? it has the roch. carb on it..my mpg seems pretty bad.
  • Les Parker
    RN Sales Team - Super Moderator
    • May 2006
    • 2020

    #2
    Light guards

    Our hosts offer these :-



    and




    Les Parker
    Tech. Support and Parts Specialist
    Rovers North Inc.

    Comment

    • disco2hse
      4th Gear
      • Jul 2010
      • 451

      #3
      Originally posted by montanarover
      also what mpg should i be getting out of my rover ? it has the roch. carb on it..my mpg seems pretty bad.
      Impossible question to answer.

      I think my string is too short and it is braided, how long should it be?
      Alan

      109 Stage 1 V8 ex-army FFR
      2005 Disco 2 HSE

      http://www.youtube.com/user/alalit

      Comment

      • Terrys
        Overdrive
        • May 2007
        • 1382

        #4
        Les, Does the catalog description "headlamps in grill..." mean the rear guards won't fit over the 4" amber indicator lenses?

        Comment

        • o2batsea
          Overdrive
          • Oct 2006
          • 1199

          #5
          Those rear lamp guards come in awful handy when trees sneak up on you from behind.

          Comment

          • TedW
            5th Gear
            • Feb 2007
            • 887

            #6
            Originally posted by o2batsea
            Those rear lamp guards come in awful handy when trees sneak up on you from behind.
            Some of us manage to back into stuff......that's one example of when they are nice to have.

            Comment

            • SafeAirOne
              Overdrive
              • Apr 2008
              • 3435

              #7
              Originally posted by TedW
              Some of us manage to back into stuff......that's one example of when they are nice to have.
              Exactly. There are plenty of "opportunities" to travel in an other-than-forward direction when off-pavement. Many of these "opportunities" occur in tight spaces, where you have to reverse into the scrub a bit.

              I will grant you that these guards serve no purpose on:

              1) Vehicles that never travel in reverse or
              2) Parked vehicles

              and they have little purpose on vehicles whose tires are unfamiliar with dirt.

              On a side note: Trees don't sneak up on you from behind. Trees don't move much at all, really.
              --Mark

              1973 SIII 109 RHD 2.5NA Diesel

              0-54mph in just under 11.5 minutes
              (9.7 minutes now that she's a 3-door).

              Comment

              • montanarover
                Low Range
                • Dec 2011
                • 9

                #8
                i need them for when i take small narrow roads to go fishing..i seem to always seem to run into these tough montana bushes that scrape and break something..i am looking for a set of used ones to use not just look cool...

                Comment

                • LaneRover
                  Overdrive
                  • Oct 2006
                  • 1743

                  #9
                  Originally posted by SafeAirOne
                  and they have little purpose on vehicles whose tires are unfamiliar with dirt.

                  On a side note: Trees don't sneak up on you from behind. Trees don't move much at all, really.
                  You must have very nice trees in your part of the country . . .
                  1958 107 SW - Sold to a better home
                  1965 109 SW - nearly running well
                  1966 88 SW - running but needing attention
                  1969 109 P-UP

                  http://www.facebook.com/album.php?ai...2&l=64cfe23aa2

                  Comment

                  • LaneRover
                    Overdrive
                    • Oct 2006
                    • 1743

                    #10
                    Originally posted by montanarover
                    does any one know were i could find a used pair of the headlight / tail brush gaurds for a series 3.. also what mpg should i be getting out of my rover ? it has the roch. carb on it..my mpg seems pretty bad.
                    What mileage are you getting?

                    I got about 16/17 mpg with a rochester on my 69 109 P-up with an overdrive.
                    1958 107 SW - Sold to a better home
                    1965 109 SW - nearly running well
                    1966 88 SW - running but needing attention
                    1969 109 P-UP

                    http://www.facebook.com/album.php?ai...2&l=64cfe23aa2

                    Comment

                    • TeriAnn
                      Overdrive
                      • Nov 2006
                      • 1087

                      #11
                      Originally posted by LaneRover
                      What mileage are you getting?

                      I got about 16/17 mpg with a rochester on my 69 109 P-up with an overdrive.
                      Highway between 15-16 with Rochester in '60 109 Dormobile with roof rack (heavier than pickup). That's at around 55 MPH. Faster you go the worse the mileage.

                      Round town or on trail mileage really sucked though. About 7 or 8 MPG. Maybe spent too much time exercising the accelerator pump in the carb.

                      Strangely enough when I converted from a 2.25L LR engine to a Ford 302 V8 with 500 cfm carb, I got identical fuel mileage which leads me to believe that a lot of a Land Rover's fuel mileage issues is based upon its wonderful streamlining. The positive thing is that the V8 has more power at idle than the 2.25L does at peak.

                      Later when I converted the 302 to EFI the highway mileage only went up about 2 MPG at the same highway cruising speeds but the trail and around town mileage went way up. Almost doubling to around 14 MPG.

                      What Series folk with the old 2.25L petrol engine need is someone who is really good at EFI develop an EFI conversion for that engine. May not help much if any on the highway but it could make a huge difference around town. And I have discovered that EFI is much smoother on the trail.
                      -

                      Teriann Wakeman_________
                      Flagstaff, AZ.




                      1960 Land Rover Dormobile, owned since 1978

                      My Land Rover web site

                      Comment

                      • Les Parker
                        RN Sales Team - Super Moderator
                        • May 2006
                        • 2020

                        #12
                        On a side note: Trees don't sneak up on you from behind. Trees don't move much at all, really.

                        Unless there's a sign saying " Heavy Plant Crossing"

                        Les Parker
                        Tech. Support and Parts Specialist
                        Rovers North Inc.

                        Comment

                        • montanarover
                          Low Range
                          • Dec 2011
                          • 9

                          #13
                          so so true ! but they do grow in your path at times ..at least the branches & brush ..but it's all worth it in a rover and to get to the alpine lakes for the fish...

                          Comment

                          • SafeAirOne
                            Overdrive
                            • Apr 2008
                            • 3435

                            #14
                            Originally posted by TeriAnn
                            Highway between 15-16 with Rochester in '60 109 Dormobile with roof rack (heavier than pickup).
                            That's not so bad, all things considered. I thought it'd be worse than that.


                            Originally posted by Les Parker
                            ...Unless there's a sign saying " Heavy Plant Crossing"


                            Still not sure what it means, but there is such a sign! Must be a UK/European thing...??
                            --Mark

                            1973 SIII 109 RHD 2.5NA Diesel

                            0-54mph in just under 11.5 minutes
                            (9.7 minutes now that she's a 3-door).

                            Comment

                            • bkreutz
                              4th Gear
                              • Apr 2010
                              • 408

                              #15
                              Originally posted by SafeAirOne
                              That's not so bad, all things considered. I thought it'd be worse than that.






                              Still not sure what it means, but there is such a sign! Must be a UK/European thing...??
                              I'm thinking that "plant" is referring to a factory as opposed to the leafy green things. (but this is just a guess)
                              Gale Breitkreutz
                              '03 Disco
                              '74 Series III 88 (sold, 4/13)
                              '47 CJ2A

                              Comment

                              Working...