Other than holding the seatbacks upright, how necessary is the crossbar that goes between the t-posts in a series III 109? (see photo) While browsing, I noticed that dormobiles don't have this bar. I don't know about pre-SIII 109s. I'd love to remove this bar so that normal-sized humans can sit straight in the back seat.
Crossbar behind front seats..Necessary??
Collapse
X
-
Crossbar behind front seats..Necessary??
--Mark
1973 SIII 109 RHD 2.5NA Diesel
0-54mph in just under 11.5 minutes
(9.7 minutes now that she's a 3-door).Tags: None -
you'll have to remove the bar after finding new seats that don't rely on the bar for support.1958 107 SW - Sold to a better home
1965 109 SW - nearly running well
1966 88 SW - running but needing attention
1969 109 P-UP
http://www.facebook.com/album.php?ai...2&l=64cfe23aa2 -
I know that you could put a bolt in the seats to make them static (where they no long fold down). But, I am guessing that you might lose some structural support for the back section by removing the bar.
The back part of the seat has a thin sheet of wood (or at least mine did). I think that if you leaned back really hard it would snap that wood. If you are worried about it...you might make a square framing, to fit around each seats back, with angle iron to reinforce the back section.
Birmabright Brotherhood
Take the vow, join the brotherhood!
Clint Rankin - 1972 SIII SWBComment
-
I was thinking more along the lines of "Is this part structurally required for the rigid-ness of the body, or is it just there to hold up the seatbacks?" Putting new seats in is easy, but I don't want the body to fold up on me if there's a heavy load on the roof rack and I'm traversing challenging terrain with that crossbar removed.--Mark
1973 SIII 109 RHD 2.5NA Diesel
0-54mph in just under 11.5 minutes
(9.7 minutes now that she's a 3-door).Comment
-
Looking at its design that bar is of extremely limited structural value as it will flex around the end plates. Other than the seat support I see no reason not to remove it. If you're worried about structural integrity run a brace from that bar mount down to the plates that mount the rear of the seat box at each side.Comment
-
Originally posted by greenmeanieLooking at its design that bar is of extremely limited structural value as it will flex around the end plates. Other than the seat support I see no reason not to remove it.--Mark
1973 SIII 109 RHD 2.5NA Diesel
0-54mph in just under 11.5 minutes
(9.7 minutes now that she's a 3-door).Comment
-
Originally posted by SafeAirOneThanks--That's what I figured--I just needed someone to independently validate my thinking.1958 107 SW - Sold to a better home
1965 109 SW - nearly running well
1966 88 SW - running but needing attention
1969 109 P-UP
http://www.facebook.com/album.php?ai...2&l=64cfe23aa2Comment
-
If your looking to remove it and add some structure, there is an aftermarket company making a bulkhead removal kit for RoW Defenders. Some RoW D's still had the bulkhead like a siers truck. The kit basically has you trim the bulkhead down and adds a bar like the NAS defenders.
I bet a local fab shop would be able to make this bar cheaply and stoutly and you should be able to tie it in fairly easy.
Kills two birds with one stone. Adds structure and looses the impediment to seat movement...Comment
-
You should be fine. But to make you feel even better about it....
A company in the UK called "Mudstuff" sells a kit for the center bulkhead removal and they do not put anything like a bar running across it.
Here is a link: http://www.mudstuff.co.uk/Bulkhead_Removal_Bar.html
Birmabright Brotherhood
Take the vow, join the brotherhood!
Clint Rankin - 1972 SIII SWBComment
-
Originally posted by Eric W SIf your looking to remove it and add some structure, there is an aftermarket company making a bulkhead removal kit for RoW Defenders. Some RoW D's still had the bulkhead like a siers truck. The kit basically has you trim the bulkhead down and adds a bar like the NAS defenders.
I bet a local fab shop would be able to make this bar cheaply and stoutly and you should be able to tie it in fairly easy.
Kills two birds with one stone. Adds structure and looses the impediment to seat movement...
Birmabright Brotherhood
Take the vow, join the brotherhood!
Clint Rankin - 1972 SIII SWBComment
-
Ah, it may not be structurally necessary but it will so a great job of splitting the rear passengers into smaller, less dangerous pieces if you stop suddenly and they are not wearing their seat belts.Comment
-
Originally posted by greenmeanieAh, it may not be structurally necessary but it will so a great job of splitting the rear passengers into smaller, less dangerous pieces if you stop suddenly and they are not wearing their seat belts.--Mark
1973 SIII 109 RHD 2.5NA Diesel
0-54mph in just under 11.5 minutes
(9.7 minutes now that she's a 3-door).Comment
-
FWIW Before anyone buys one, you might want to find out why the website says it doesn't fit Series vehicles.
It may be a simple reason that doesn't matter to someone who doesn't mind a little work to make it fit. But it may be a bit more involved.
Brent1958 107 SW - Sold to a better home
1965 109 SW - nearly running well
1966 88 SW - running but needing attention
1969 109 P-UP
http://www.facebook.com/album.php?ai...2&l=64cfe23aa2Comment
Comment