2.25 Diesel

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • kidrover86

    2.25 Diesel

    I will be performing a mechanical restoration of a series IIa 109 this summer. We are considering swapping the petrol for a diesel and running biodiesel. Does anybody have experience with the 2.25 diesel? I believe they are the same block as the gas and it should mate fine with the tranny right? Also, does anybody know the approx. output of the diesel? I assume it produces more torque. Thanks in advance!
  • SafeAirOne
    Overdrive
    • Apr 2008
    • 3435

    #2
    Originally posted by kidrover86
    I will be performing a mechanical restoration of a series IIa 109 this summer. We are considering swapping the petrol for a diesel and running biodiesel. Does anybody have experience with the 2.25 diesel? I believe they are the same block as the gas and it should mate fine with the tranny right? Also, does anybody know the approx. output of the diesel? I assume it produces more torque. Thanks in advance!
    Although you CAN use the 2.25 diesel, it'll work HARD hauling around a 109. My 2.5 diesel, which also mates right up with a 4-cyl bellhousing, has it's work cut out for it pulling my 109 around; I can't imagine putting a lower-displacement diesel in a 109.

    Generally, on gas engines and a diesel engines with the same displacement, the diesel will have less horsepower. This, as I understand it, is the reason Rover developed the 2.5 diesel--So it could have roughtly the same output as the 2.25 petrol.

    Just my $0.02...
    --Mark

    1973 SIII 109 RHD 2.5NA Diesel

    0-54mph in just under 11.5 minutes
    (9.7 minutes now that she's a 3-door).

    Comment

    • leafsprung
      Overdrive
      • Nov 2006
      • 1008

      #3
      2.25 Diesel produces LESS torque than the 2.25 gas. Common misconception. It does make peak torque at much lower RPMs though.

      Comment

      • superstator
        2nd Gear
        • Aug 2008
        • 298

        #4
        I'd always heard the rule of thumb for a basic non-turbo diesel was about 30-40% less fuel used for the same displacement, but also 10-15% less power both in HP and peak torque.

        In any case, the 2.25d in my 109 gets the job done, but barely. Without an OD, I'd say my top speed is about 45mph, 50 if I'm feeling saucy. With the OD I could reach 55 or 60 on a flat road with some patience. Throw in a hill of any kind and all bets are off. Around town though I've actually been pretty happy with it, but I wouldn't recommend it to anybody unless you're fully prepared to be the slowest vehicle on the road.
        '67 109 NADA #413 - rebuilding w/ TDI & galvy chassis.

        Comment

        • kidrover86

          #5
          Good to know thanks guys. Its lookin like we might just drop in one of those new high compression ratio 2.25 petrol's and call it a day.

          Comment

          • yorker
            Overdrive
            • Nov 2006
            • 1635

            #6
            Originally posted by superstator
            I'd always heard the rule of thumb for a basic non-turbo diesel was about 30-40% less fuel used for the same displacement, but also 10-15% less power both in HP and peak torque.
            I'm not even sure the increase in MPG is worth it (on road anyway)- What do 2.25d's get as a rule? 25mpg? I've seen well tuned 2.25 petrols do almost 20 mpg.

            Last edited by yorker; 04-17-2009, 09:50 AM.
            1965 SIIa 88",1975 Ex-MOD 109/Ambulance, 1989 RRC, blah, blah, blah...

            Land Rover UK Forums

            Comment

            • leafsprung
              Overdrive
              • Nov 2006
              • 1008

              #7
              they get 30 with relative ease. They are pretty efficient.


              new high compression ratio 2.25 petrol's and call it a day.
              Just do a nice rebuild or convert to a real motor

              Comment

              • yorker
                Overdrive
                • Nov 2006
                • 1635

                #8
                1965 SIIa 88",1975 Ex-MOD 109/Ambulance, 1989 RRC, blah, blah, blah...

                Land Rover UK Forums

                Comment

                • superstator
                  2nd Gear
                  • Aug 2008
                  • 298

                  #9
                  Originally posted by yorker
                  I'm not even sure the increase in MPG is worth it (on road anyway)- What do 2.25d's get as a rule? 25mpg? I've seen well tuned 2.25 petrols do almost 20 mpg.

                  http://forum.landrovernet.com/showthread.php?t=155302
                  I'd guess I get about 25-30 around town, less on the highway where it really struggles. The real advantage to me is being able to use biodiesel or diesel according to whim, and of course reliability. I like knowing that I could burn the electrics to the ground, and as long as that engine is turning over I can still limp home.
                  '67 109 NADA #413 - rebuilding w/ TDI & galvy chassis.

                  Comment

                  • yorker
                    Overdrive
                    • Nov 2006
                    • 1635

                    #10
                    Originally posted by superstator
                    I'd guess I get about 25-30 around town, less on the highway where it really struggles. The real advantage to me is being able to use biodiesel or diesel according to whim, and of course reliability. I like knowing that I could burn the electrics to the ground, and as long as that engine is turning over I can still limp home.

                    30mpg isn't so bad- maybe I was thinking UK gallons? I have a spare 2.25d sitting in the garage and I like the idea of 30mpg, less volatile fuel, etc. I'm just not sure I could deal with even less performance than a 2.25p in today's world. My LR's are all like little time machines but I can't shake the feeling that that would be turning back the clock too far with regard to on road performance. I keep thinking about all the 23 window VW busses that would pass me going uphill...
                    1965 SIIa 88",1975 Ex-MOD 109/Ambulance, 1989 RRC, blah, blah, blah...

                    Land Rover UK Forums

                    Comment

                    • Eric W S
                      5th Gear
                      • Dec 2006
                      • 609

                      #11
                      I wonder how a Turner 2.25 D would be? I wonder if it would make it any better?

                      Comment

                      • superstator
                        2nd Gear
                        • Aug 2008
                        • 298

                        #12
                        I doubt it. They don't make a "performance" diesel head that I know of - it's not like a petrol where you can monkey with the way the fuel and air mix, or shave it for better compression. All you can do is feed it more air. I have wondered what a low pressure supercharger would do, but I think at that point you may as well find a decent 200tdi for a similar price.
                        '67 109 NADA #413 - rebuilding w/ TDI & galvy chassis.

                        Comment

                        • Eric W S
                          5th Gear
                          • Dec 2006
                          • 609

                          #13
                          Originally posted by superstator
                          I doubt it. They don't make a "performance" diesel head that I know of - it's not like a petrol where you can monkey with the way the fuel and air mix, or shave it for better compression. All you can do is feed it more air. I have wondered what a low pressure supercharger would do, but I think at that point you may as well find a decent 200tdi for a similar price.
                          "Turner Engineering produces performance gasflowed cylinder heads for Rover V8 petrol, 2.25 & 2.5 petrol 4 cylinder engines and 2.5 Diesel, 2.5 Turbo Diesel, 200 & 300TDI diesel engines."

                          From their website. Also has several testimonials regarding the improvements for diesels of all types from the 2.25 to the 300tdi...

                          I have never tuned a diesel, but from the products out there you can do more to it than adjust intake...

                          I'd like to drive one. If it was the same as the HP petrol engine, it would be worth it...

                          Comment

                          • kidrover86

                            #14
                            The engine is pretty shot we were thinking of just coring it and getting a new one. Unless you still think it would be cheaper to rebuild the entire thing? With all the rebuild parts kits rovers north offered it was going to be around the same price as a crate motor. Maybe there are cheaper places to get parts?

                            Comment

                            • superstator
                              2nd Gear
                              • Aug 2008
                              • 298

                              #15
                              But, if you look at their pricelist, they only have perfomance heads available for the 200tdi and 300tdi, and all the testimonials for 2.25's are either for petrol gasflows, or just basic diesel head replacements. I don't doubt they can make some big improvements to the newer forced induction engines, but on an old indirect NA heap like the 2.25 there's only so much that you can do.

                              That said, if they'd like to send me a sample head I'd happily give it a review . I would love to be proven wrong...
                              '67 109 NADA #413 - rebuilding w/ TDI & galvy chassis.

                              Comment

                              Working...