I will be performing a mechanical restoration of a series IIa 109 this summer. We are considering swapping the petrol for a diesel and running biodiesel. Does anybody have experience with the 2.25 diesel? I believe they are the same block as the gas and it should mate fine with the tranny right? Also, does anybody know the approx. output of the diesel? I assume it produces more torque. Thanks in advance!
2.25 Diesel
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by kidrover86I will be performing a mechanical restoration of a series IIa 109 this summer. We are considering swapping the petrol for a diesel and running biodiesel. Does anybody have experience with the 2.25 diesel? I believe they are the same block as the gas and it should mate fine with the tranny right? Also, does anybody know the approx. output of the diesel? I assume it produces more torque. Thanks in advance!
Generally, on gas engines and a diesel engines with the same displacement, the diesel will have less horsepower. This, as I understand it, is the reason Rover developed the 2.5 diesel--So it could have roughtly the same output as the 2.25 petrol.
Just my $0.02...--Mark
1973 SIII 109 RHD 2.5NA Diesel
0-54mph in just under 11.5 minutes
(9.7 minutes now that she's a 3-door). -
2.25 Diesel produces LESS torque than the 2.25 gas. Common misconception. It does make peak torque at much lower RPMs though.Comment
-
I'd always heard the rule of thumb for a basic non-turbo diesel was about 30-40% less fuel used for the same displacement, but also 10-15% less power both in HP and peak torque.
In any case, the 2.25d in my 109 gets the job done, but barely. Without an OD, I'd say my top speed is about 45mph, 50 if I'm feeling saucy. With the OD I could reach 55 or 60 on a flat road with some patience. Throw in a hill of any kind and all bets are off. Around town though I've actually been pretty happy with it, but I wouldn't recommend it to anybody unless you're fully prepared to be the slowest vehicle on the road.'67 109 NADA #413 - rebuilding w/ TDI & galvy chassis.Comment
-
Originally posted by superstatorI'd always heard the rule of thumb for a basic non-turbo diesel was about 30-40% less fuel used for the same displacement, but also 10-15% less power both in HP and peak torque.
Last edited by yorker; 04-17-2009, 09:50 AM.Comment
-
they get 30 with relative ease. They are pretty efficient.
new high compression ratio 2.25 petrol's and call it a day.Comment
-
Comment
-
Originally posted by yorkerI'm not even sure the increase in MPG is worth it (on road anyway)- What do 2.25d's get as a rule? 25mpg? I've seen well tuned 2.25 petrols do almost 20 mpg.
http://forum.landrovernet.com/showthread.php?t=155302'67 109 NADA #413 - rebuilding w/ TDI & galvy chassis.Comment
-
Originally posted by superstatorI'd guess I get about 25-30 around town, less on the highway where it really struggles. The real advantage to me is being able to use biodiesel or diesel according to whim, and of course reliability. I like knowing that I could burn the electrics to the ground, and as long as that engine is turning over I can still limp home.
30mpg isn't so bad- maybe I was thinking UK gallons? I have a spare 2.25d sitting in the garage and I like the idea of 30mpg, less volatile fuel, etc. I'm just not sure I could deal with even less performance than a 2.25p in today's world. My LR's are all like little time machines but I can't shake the feeling that that would be turning back the clock too far with regard to on road performance. I keep thinking about all the 23 window VW busses that would pass me going uphill...Comment
-
I doubt it. They don't make a "performance" diesel head that I know of - it's not like a petrol where you can monkey with the way the fuel and air mix, or shave it for better compression. All you can do is feed it more air. I have wondered what a low pressure supercharger would do, but I think at that point you may as well find a decent 200tdi for a similar price.'67 109 NADA #413 - rebuilding w/ TDI & galvy chassis.Comment
-
Originally posted by superstatorI doubt it. They don't make a "performance" diesel head that I know of - it's not like a petrol where you can monkey with the way the fuel and air mix, or shave it for better compression. All you can do is feed it more air. I have wondered what a low pressure supercharger would do, but I think at that point you may as well find a decent 200tdi for a similar price.
From their website. Also has several testimonials regarding the improvements for diesels of all types from the 2.25 to the 300tdi...
I have never tuned a diesel, but from the products out there you can do more to it than adjust intake...
I'd like to drive one. If it was the same as the HP petrol engine, it would be worth it...Comment
-
The engine is pretty shot we were thinking of just coring it and getting a new one. Unless you still think it would be cheaper to rebuild the entire thing? With all the rebuild parts kits rovers north offered it was going to be around the same price as a crate motor. Maybe there are cheaper places to get parts?Comment
-
But, if you look at their pricelist, they only have perfomance heads available for the 200tdi and 300tdi, and all the testimonials for 2.25's are either for petrol gasflows, or just basic diesel head replacements. I don't doubt they can make some big improvements to the newer forced induction engines, but on an old indirect NA heap like the 2.25 there's only so much that you can do.
That said, if they'd like to send me a sample head I'd happily give it a review. I would love to be proven wrong...
'67 109 NADA #413 - rebuilding w/ TDI & galvy chassis.Comment
Comment