All I know is with the oil bath, my truck couldn't do 70 mph. With the K&N and no other changes, it will go faster than 70 mph. The "it'll wear the engine out" sentiment hasn't been my experience. I've had them on a number of street and race cars for years. When properly oiled, there is no appreciable increased wear. An old English engine with 80K or 100K miles is going to need a rebuild regardless of the air filter fitted.
Series Air filter upgrade
Collapse
X
-
-
You do realize of course that with stock gears, Suffix C or later transfercase & 32 inch dia tyres you are turning 4000 RPM at 70 MPH. An earlier transfercase or smaller tyres and you are revving higher.-
Teriann Wakeman_________
Flagstaff, AZ.
1960 Land Rover Dormobile, owned since 1978
My Land Rover web site
Comment
-
air resistance
every 90 degree bend in the air intake is the equivelant of 10ft of straight pipe. the snorkle is for dusty conditions, it is more restrictive than the oil bath. the LR engine works find with the K&N filter, we are talking about an almost tractor engine.1968 battlefield ambulance/camper
1963 Unimog Radio box
1995 LWB RRComment
-
What's wrong with 4000rpm? Been cruising at that engine speed for nearly 40 years. So far so good. If 4K scares you, you should hear 6K or 7K. Before retirement, my MGA (three main bearings and all) would see those speeds. I wouldn't spin the Rover that fast; there's no need, but there's nothing wrong with 4K. I have 30" tires and an OD, btw.© 1974 Apis Mellifera. Few rights preserved.Comment
-
--Mark
1973 SIII 109 RHD 2.5NA Diesel
0-54mph in just under 11.5 minutes
(9.7 minutes now that she's a 3-door).Comment
-
Comment
-
Thank you. Everytime K&N comes up on any forum that I have been on, the old filtration and power debates start. You should see it on the 911 forums!!!! Guys there even dyno with and without to see difference in power.
I've got one on the 930, with zero noticeable difference in power, but it does make wonderful intake music when I get on it. The only reason I did it was to clean up the engine bay and to make it easier to make CO adjustments...was thinking same for the IIa, but I may just leave the oilbath on...
timTim
63 IIA 88" (Beach with the dogs)
05 L322 (Daily)
95 RRC SWB
05 E320 (Wife)
86 930 (Rush on boost, 400HP and climbing....)
A few boring BMW's for the kids (E30, E36, E46, E53)Comment
-
Tim,
With all cars it's "air in....exhaust out" the least restriction the better on either end. Clean is good, finding the best of both is the answer. Low HP motors need to heed this more than any.
Rob
69 Bug Eye 88
67 Mini Cooper
67 M.G. Midget
67 V.W. series 1 sunroof
64 356 C Coupe
09 911 C4 Cab
K+N's on all of themLast edited by bugeye88; 10-30-2013, 12:08 PM.Comment
-
I can tell you that being able to cruise comfortably at 65 mph is a lot better than lower speeds. Especially on the interstates.
Where I live, if you want to get anywhere in any kind of reasonable time, you hit the I-roads. Am I doing 85? No. But I'm pretty gosh darn close to the posted speed limit (and above in some places). Anyway, I am going pretty close to the speed of traffic which is what I want and the best way to stay out of trouble. Oh and stay in the right lane.
Anywho, I went to a cone filter since I did dual batteries. Removed the oil bath to make room for a 2nd battery. I have no regrets.Comment
-
I have seen dino tests on different air intake filter setups where a 300 buck system gives a increase in intake air temp and a loss in power. i want to play with on a stock rover and make a ram air system (a poor mans blower) and also play with different plenum risers. my 109 i have kept stock the oil bath air filter setup and it seems to work good.Comment
Comment